Respected Ali Sina!
Sir, as you yourself admit, humans sometimes commit such horrible crimes which are unbelievable. Recently the gang rape of a girl in Delhi who later died is one such example. It is understood that mere laws cannot keep a person away from these crimes.
You say that humans have moral consciousness because of evolution and Muslims are diseased humans because of their religion. If Muslims are diseased, what happened to other people who are evolutionary healthy?
Isn’t there a need of strong belief in the life after death because all people will not keep away from evil merely thinking that they are humans and they should not fall to the level of animals or even lower. Isn’t the call of conscience a proof of some creator and life after death?
Laws alone are not enough to deter people from committing crime. They must also have an inner moral compass. This compass is a product of human evolution.
Our morality, like our intelligence, is a function of our brain. How do you make people smarter? You need a good mind and good training. If the brain is physically defective, for example, if a person has Down syndrome or has some other form of learning disability, it is not easy for that person to become an Einstein. He may become a prodigy in music or other arts, but his IQ will be low.
The next factor is training. If Einstein had been born in an Islamic country where instead of science books, which he was given at the age of ten, he was given the Quran, he would have become another idiot mullah and not the genius that he became.
You may compare the brain to a computer: both the hardware and the software must work property for the computer to do its work.
Morality works in much the same way as intelligence does. You need both a healthy mind and a good moral education to develop a high moral quotient. People suffering from certain emotional disorders, such as narcissists and sociopaths don’t have empathy. Empathy is a Greek word. It translates as “in suffering”. It is the ability to feel the pain and suffering of others. Narcissists and sociopaths cannot recognize the feelings and needs of others. “This deficiency renders them emotionally and cognitively crippled. They exploit, manipulate, and abuse other people because they are unable to relate to them otherwise.” [From the book "Malignant Self-love: Narcissism Revisited" by Sam Vaknin - Click on this link to purchase: http://www.narcissistic-abuse.com/thebook.html]
Vaknin compares narcissists to robots or machines. “In many important respects they are forms of alien and artificial intelligence. They lack the ability to empathize, that quintessence that makes us human in the first place. Consequently, they regard others as mere instruments of gratification to be used, abused, and then contemptuously discarded.” That is exactly what those men did to that young girl in New Delhi.
Crimes such as what you mentioned happen everywhere. Sociopaths love torturing and abusing others. They get a high from it. They can’t feel remorse because they can’t relate with the pain that they cause to others. Inflicting pain on others excites them. They need to see the agony of their victims to satisfy their sadistic craving. By destroying others, crushing them, torturing them, raping them and dismembering them they feel empowered. No amount of education and preaching will help. There is no solution except removing them from the society. They are damaged humans, beyond repair.
The question is how these people became damaged in the first place and what we can do to prevent that happening to others. Psychology, not religion, provides the answer.
Abused children are more likely to develop one form or another of mental disorder. Patriarchal societies are abusive towards children and towards women. Misogyny results in lowering women’s self-esteem. These women become mothers and pass that low self-esteem to their children. As the result everyone in patriarchal societies is damaged.
Low self-esteem results in depression, paranoia, borderline, dependent, histrionic, obsessive-compulsive, narcissistic, antisocial, and other forms of personality disorders. It is no secret that these disorders are more prevalent among Muslims than among Europeans. It is far more likely that Muslims resort to aggression to resolve their conflicts than Canadians. Most Muslim women suffer from depression. Most Muslim men suffer from narcissism. These disorders are the result of patriarchy that has afflicted Muslim families and Muslim societies. No patriarchal society can produce emotionally healthy individuals, whether it is Islamic or not. Although sociopaths exist in all societies, there are more of them in male dominated patriarchal societies.
We cannot get rid of crime by imposing more stringent laws. The laws of Islam are draconian and yet there is more rape, more homicide and more crimes of all sorts in Islamic countries than in non-Muslim countries. The punishment against homosexuality in Islam is death, and yet almost all Muslim Arabs are gay. An apostate friend of mine living in a Persian Gulf state said her fiancé’s car broke and a nice Arab man stopped to help. He gave them a ride to the town and first dropped her English fiancé. As soon as he was out of the car, this nice gentleman started talking about sex, saying how Arab men are better at sex than the whites. He said he is married but still likes to have sex with other women and also men. He told her about Filipino male prostitutes acting as masseuse and said everyone does it. There you have it. I want to be conservative, so I say 90% of Arab men are gay. Has the death punishment stopped it?
When Muhammad promises young pearly boys to pious men in paradise, the message is that this is something divine that you get only as reward. If that is such a wonderful think then how can you prohibit it in this world?
Alcohol is prohibited in Islam. Don’t Muslims drink? They don’t eat pork, but had Muhammad promised pork in heaven Muslims would have eaten it secretly. The stupidity of Muhammad is beyond belief and the stupidity of so many educated people who think that narcissist was a prophet is even more astounding.
You can reduce petty theft by introducing a draconian law such as chopping the hand of the thief, but you can’t get rid of white collar theft. Why would otherwise politicians and the ruling mullahs be so rich? If you steal a loaf of bread you lose your hand but if you steal millions and billions, you are okay.
Then again, is the morality be based on fear moral? Can a cat who does not steal your food because he is afraid of you be called a moral cat? The moment you turn your head he’ll steal your food. Moral is one who has an inner control. If you put a gun on someone’s head you can make him do anything. You can ask for his valet and even his shirt and he’ll hand it to you. Can we then conclude that this person is a generous person? Of course not! A person who gives you money under threats cannot be called generous, moral or virtuous. These higher qualities that define our humanity become relevant through freedom. If I don’t steal from you because I fear you I cannot be called an honest man. Only when I don’t steal even when you are not watching and I can get away with it, I can be called an honest person. The morality based on fear is not moral at all.
Religious morality, and here my emphasis is on Islam, is based on fear. Not just fear but also greed. In Islam the concept of doing something right for the sake of it does not exist. The motivation is either reward or punishment. Everything a Muslim does is either for the greed of reward or for the fear of punishment. You can’t call this ethos morality.
In Islam, humans are deemed to be like animals that can only respond to either stick or to carrot. The question is why. To find the answer you have to revisit my theory about Muhammad’s narcissism.
A narcissist projects his own values on others. Since he lacks morality and will do anything when he knows he can get away with it, he believes everyone will do the same. He disdains others because he disdains himself. Deep down inside he knows that he is a wretched person. He is motivated only by greed and deterred by fear. When the narcissist becomes a cult leader, (as all of them try and often succeed forming a mini cult, which may consist of a co-dependent partner) they keep their followers in leash through fear and empty promises of rewards. This is the only value system they are familiar with.
Muhammad’s hell and his heaven are the products of his narcissistic mind. He could not understand why anyone would do anything without the greed for a reward or the fear of a punishment. An emotionally mature person does not need any reward or punishment to do the right thing. They do the right thing because it is the right thing to do.
A child may become motivated to study if he is promised a reward or if he fears failing his grades. Adults don’t need such motivations to learn. They go after learning because they love it. The learning is the reward in itself.
How we judge others boils down to who we are. If you are Muhammad or a follower of him, you see others the way you are. This is called projection. You are not motivated to do anything without reward or punishment. Therefore, when you become the law giver, your laws reflect your own sick personality and will be based on either fear or greed. That is why Muhammad’s laws are the way they are.
This is not how morality is defined. We cannot say any Muslim is a moral person. We can call them moral only if they do the right thing without the fear of a hell and greed of a heaven, in other words, when they are no longer Muslims.
As for the crime in Delhi, the man who injured the girl by pushing an iron rod into her vagina which caused her death was a Muslim. Apart from being a sociopaths he grew up listening to the mullahs telling him how the unbelieving women are sluts and how the prophet allowed Muslims to rape them. Not all Muslims do such thing but all Muslims approve of what Muhammad did and said. All Muslims defend that fiend’s crimes. All Muslims praise that monster. All Muslims promote the sunnah of that evildoer. How then can you call them innocent?
During the current year thousands of Muslims were butchered for a fault of a few though the killers belonged to Buddhism, which you call a good religion. Why did they fall so low although they were not the followers of a bad religion?
If I cared about people’s approval, I would have said I condemn all acts of violence from whichever side it may be. That sounds like a cliché and everyone says it. Even Muslims say it, though disingenuously. But that would make me a hypocrite like them. I rather receive approval from my own conscience than receive it form others.
I don’t condemn the violence of the Buddhist against Muslims. Now this is an outrageous thing to say – something my foes will love to quote to portray me as a war monger. So why do I say such thing?
Yes it is very sad that innocent Muslims are killed by Buddhists. But I don’t condemn it, because if the Buddhists don’t stop the Islamic invasion today they will lose their country and then they will be slaughtered just as we Persians were slaughtered and the Copts are being slaughtered.
There should be no tolerance towards Islam. We know what Islam teaches and what Muslims do. The Quran gives three choices to non-believers, accept Islam, or get out of your land because it now belongs to us, or we will kill you. I cannot force Muslims to denounce this teaching. But I can encourage others to adopt it. Why it is so wrong for Buddhists to do to Muslim invaders in their country what Muslims do to others all over the world? Why when these things are said in the Quran they are deemed to be divine and when I approve of them they become evil? Why it is okay to kill the Copts in Egypt and it is wrong to kill Muslims in Burma. The Muslims in Burma are invaders, while the Copts are the original inhabitants of Egypt. Why so much hypocrisy? I will not condemn the killing of Muslims in Burma until the killing of Copts in Egypt ends, until the killing of Hindus in Kashmir ends, until the abuse of the Hindus in Pakistan and in Bangladesh ends. Until the Muslims in Philippine stop their terrorism against the Christians, until the Muslims in Nigeria stop their violence against the Christians. Enough with hypocrisy! If the Burmese let the Muslims, soon they will be the persecuted ones in their own country. The Muslims in Burma came from Bangladesh, from where they exterminated the Hindus. Let them go back to where they came from. Who said the life of a Muslim is worth more than the life of non-Muslims? Yes Muslims think that way but they are wrong. If we don’t value our lives and don’t defend it while we still can they will butcher us like they do sheep and cattle during their Eid al-Adha.
Anyone who has read my articles knows that I don’t promote violence. I value life, all life, including the life of animals. I don’t believe a stone, or a building or a book to be sacred. They are just things. But I believe life is sacred. So why would I say such thing? Because I want to highlight the hypocrisy of Muslims! I want them to condemn me as a hate monger for echoing what they believe to be the word of God.
If what I say is evil, (and it is) let Muslim condemn the Quran first before they condemn me. Let them denounce these evil teachings and the evil man who said them first. Tolerance is a two way street. You can’t expect everyone to be tolerant to Muslims and ignore the fact that Muslims are intolerant of everyone.
The Buddhists in Burma are giving Muslims a taste of their own medicine. Yes innocent people also get killed. But Muslims are waging a war of conquest and domination. In a war you don’t ask who is innocent and who is not. You ask on whose side you are. We (the free world) nuked Hiroshima and Nagasaki and killed thousand s of innocent people including children, but I don’t condemn it because that bombing ended the war and saved millions of lives. We bombed Berlin and destroyed that city, killing as many as we could, but I don’t condemn it, because it demoralized the belligerent Germans and made them surrender. Had the war continued millions more would have been killed.
The Germans and the Japanese had a fanatical belief that they will never be defeated. This unrealistic belief made them so cut off from reality that they continued the war even when it was clear to everyone else that they will not win. They needed an awakening and only then they accepted defeat and stopped their insane attacks. Remember that they were the aggressors. They started the war.
Muslims have the same fanatical belief. They think they will be victorious. As Muhammad assured them in the Quran, they think they can win armies that are ten times superior to them. That is why they continue this war and push their plan to conquer the world through ghazwa (terrorism) and taqiyyah (deception).
If we don’t stop Muslims now, the whole world will be lost and billions of people may be killed. We have no other choice. We cannot submit to Muslims. And since dialogue for Muslims is out of question the only thing left for us is to fight them.
The attacks on Muslims started when a few Bengali Muslims assaulted and brutally butchered a Buddhist girl. This sparked the violence and led the Buddhists to kill the Muslims. The question is why Muslims think Buddhists girls are legitimate target? The problem is that this kind of barbarity is sanctioned in the Quran. That son of the bitch Muhammad did it so his followers do it. Are you still telling me Muslims are innocent? No there is no such thing as innocent Muslim. Anyone who agrees with Muhammad’s crimes and strives to emulate that criminal is not innocent.
Innocent Muslim makes as much sense as innocent Nazi. Yes of course there were innocent Nazis or just plain Germans who followed the orders. It does not matter whether your enemy is innocent or not. He is the enemy and if you don’t kill him he will kill you. This enmity is not instigated by me. It is instigated by Muhammad who has repeatedly warned his followers not to take as friends the unbelievers, even if they are their brothers and father.
How can a person who believes in the Quran that says slay the unbelievers wherever you find them, cut their throats from above their necks, crucify them and chop their finger tips, be harsh with them, they are filthy, don’t befriend them and other delightful things such as these be called innocent? No Muslim who thinks non-Muslims should be slain can be innocent. Let us call a spade a spake and drop this stupid politically correct nonsense talk. If you are a Muslim it follows you believe in the Quran. Then you approve all that hate and violence against me and everyone who is not a Muslim. So how can you be innocent? You are guilty as sin. There is no such thing as innocent Muslim. There are ignorant Muslims and terrorist Muslims . If you are ignorant here is the truth. Open your eyes and learn what your religion says. If you disagree then leave Islam as most of us have. But if you still want to remain a Muslim don’t pretend to be innocent.
My plan is to awaken Muslim with my writings. If it fails we have no other choice but to stop them with force. We should give them the same three choices they give us. Leave Islam, or leave our countries or face our wrath. We don’t want your religion, take it away and shove it where it belongs. Go back to where you came from. We have no tolerance for a religion that does not have tolerance.
When the masses wake up and see the plot and how their leftist governments have betrayed them and how their treasonous liberal media have lied to them they will rise and Muslims will find no peace in Europe and in America. It would be brutal, it would be bloody and ugly, but it would be far worse if we did nothing. Islam is a cancer. This tumor must be removed before it is late.
My work is like therapy. I hate bloodshed and that is why I am doing everything I can to rescue Muslims from their madness and make them see Muhammad was a mentally sick man. He lied. We are brothers not enemies. But if I fail the bloody alternative will be inevitable. And yes I approve it, because if we wait billions could perish and human civilization could be lost. I am a man of peace, but not a pacifist. I am also pragmatic. There is a time to talk, a time to reason., a time for peace, a time for tolerance and a time for war.
In one article you wrote that even after death ‘I’ remains there. What does that mean?
We survive through our work. We all survive though the impact that we make on others and the changes that we bring to the world. When you throw a stone on a pound, the stone will sink and will disappear but the ripples that it generates survive and keep expanding. Muhammad is living in all the evil, violence and bloodshed that he left behind. Still people are killed because that evil soul lived. Galileo is living through the enlightenment and progress that he brought to the world. Hitler is living through all the pain that he caused to mankind. Mother Teresa is living through all the lives that she enriched and the legacy of love that she left behind. My grandmother, an illiterate unknown woman, lives though the love she had for her children and for me. I too will survive, just as you and everyone else will. How we survive depends on what we leave behind. I hope to leave enlightenment and a world with less violence and less hate. I will survive in the lives of the children and grandchildren of all those whom I helped to leave Islam, who will now go after science and improve their lives instead of wasting in in a religion of hate and obscurantism. I will be living in the lives of millions, even when they don’t know my name.
Whenever a man suffers he calls his God even if he has never been a worshiper. Doesn’t it point that there is some Listener otherwise why is this belief engraved in our psyche. It is said that the greatest atheist also remembered God at the time of death. Please throw light.
Only believers in God say such thing. I have stopped praying a long time ago. I don’t say that God does not exist. I don’t know. But what I am certain of is that no one is listening. You might was well pray to a wall. The chance that the wall may answer your prayer is just the same as God will answer it.
The foundation of this world is based on injustice. If really a conscious being created this universe the way it is, making some sentient creatures to be food to others, that being deserves our scorn not our praise.
We live in the age of science and enlightenment. The more we discover the secrets of the universe the more a creator becomes irrelevant.
New addition Jan 20, 2013
Respected Ali Sina, Sir, Although I am not a scholar to argue with yet I would not hesitate to point towards your extremism. I would request you to just have Google search of ‘comparison between crime rate in KSA and USA’. I think by resorting to exaggeration against Islam and Muslims, you make your arguments weak. Saying that 90% of Muslims are gay is far from reality. You have yourself been a Muslim and many of your relatives will be still Muslims. I myself am living in Muslim dominated society and I acknowledge that many Muslims indulge in criminal activities but your saying that Muslims are at top of crime is only because of your extreme hatred and by resorting to misinformation you would damage your own cause. your saying ‘enemy is enemy whether innocent or not’ is very unfortunate. There is a difference between war and rioting. It is true that in a war innocent people can get killed in spite of great care but that does not make lawful for a majority to go and burn innocent people of minority. There have been riots in India not only against Muslims but against Christians also and in which Christians were burnt alive and nuns raped. The extremist Hindus accuse Christians of converting Hindus to Christianity.What do say there?
Most crimes in Saudi Arabia are not even reported. No woman dares to report the crime of rape. The laws are stacked against her. If she cannot produce four male witnesses, she could be beaten for making false accusation but her claim can be uses as confession which can incriminate her of adultery. What to an American is considered crime to a Saudi is normal. It is very unfair to claim the KSA is better than USA and it has less crime.
I am afraid the 90% is not too exaggerated. Persians have grown out of that to a great extent. But Arabs and Afghans have not. I said 90% but this Arab gentleman said everyone. As for Persians, yes I am afraid this was true one day. We have the poetry of our celebrated poets to prove this was the case. Enlightenment entered Iran at the beginning of the 20th century and my country was changed drastically. Don’t judge Iranians by the Islamic revolution. That is not what people wanted. It was a mistake. However, as I am told homosexuality is still rampant among the clerics in Iran.
Extremism breeds extremism. Take the example of Europe. Since after the war, European countries have strived towards tolerance and have been the most liberal and free countries in the history of mankind. But lo and behold, all that is gradually changing. People are becoming restless and laws are being proposed and implemented to stop the flow of immigrants and ban some of their activities such as wearing hijab and building mosques. This is called backlash. The Europeans are becoming less tolerant as the result of the abuses that take place in their countries. This is inevitable and it would be foolish to condemn it. Anyone has the right to self-defense. Defense of our values and cultures is part of it.
Problems must be solved from where they originate. Band Aid solutions don’t solve the problem. Blaming both side is not smart but very foolish. In every fight one person is guilty. We should not condemn both.
Look at what happened in Yugoslavia. On the surface it seemed that the Serbs were persecuting the helpless innocent Muslims. But when you dig deeper it becomes clear that they were only reacting to centuries of Muslim abuse.
In the 15th century, the Ottoman Turks, without provocation, invaded and conquered Christian Albania, the Romanian kingdoms (Wallachia and Moldova), Bulgaria, Serbia, Bosnia, southern Croatia, what is now Greece, and most of Hungary. Albania fell after a heroic resistance by the Christian Albanians under Gjergj Skanderbeg. Bosnia fell by 1485 with little difficulty. Serbia put a heroic and famous series of revolts against the invading Muslims in the fields of Serbia’s Kosovo in 1389 that left the Ottoman sultan Murat slain, and Belgrade (1456). Despite their heroic resistance to unprovoked conquests of the mighty Ottomans, the Serbs fell and became subjects of the Ottoman realm like their Bosnian brothers for the next 400 years.
Under the Muslims, the Serbs and Bosnians enjoyed no freedom of religion. The ancient lands of the Serbs and Bosnians were taken, their great palaces and treasures becoming the property of a hated and very foreign enemy. The conquest of these free peoples was not provoked. Christians lived as second-class citizens in their own homelands, unable to enjoy political franchise unless they either betrayed their nation and families by converting to Islam and fighting their own countrymen and fellow Christians in the Ottoman armies (the Janissaries). A blood tax called devshirme forced Christian European mothers to give up every few male family members (varies by population census) to be forcibly conscripted into the Janissary elite in Istanbul after forced conversion to Islam, with many returning to their nations to fight against the villages of their birth. The majestic wealth and education the Islamic world had to offer at this time of Muslim conquest was often quite appealing to many families for their sons instead of death or starvation. Their options were to adopt Islam or, in many cases, starve to death. Many families under Islamic rule professed submission to Islam solely to inherit the benefits, but instead practiced the faith of their heritage in private to avoid persecution or death. Apostasy was punished by death. The Christian natives also paid inordinate taxes. Balkan subjects, often prone to famine and underproduction of grain at this time, were barely able to survive, let alone pay large taxes. [Read more here]
The Janissaries. Christian children taken to Istanbul and forcefully converted to Islam.
When in 1805 the Serbians rebelled, the Muslims quashed their rebellion and massacred them ruthlessly. To warn others from doing the same they erected a tower with the Serbian sculls.
This is just one example where on the surface it appeared that the non-Muslims were persecuting the innocent Muslims. Everywhere, where there is a conflict between Muslims and non-Muslims, even when Muslims look as victims and the underdogs, they are the culprits. Muslims are always the guilty party. I hate the word “always”. Logically, there should be exceptions to any rule, and I would love to find that exception. If anyone can help I’d be grateful. Show me one case where Muslims are victimized without provocation.
You mentioned the persecution of the Christians in the hands of Hindus. I could also bring other cases such as the crusades and the inquisition where on the surface Islam had nothing to do with them. But that is only on the surface.
Hinduism is not a religion. It is a spiritual tradition of Indians consisting of many philosophies. Most of these philosophies, if not all, are peaceful and tolerant. However, Hindus have witnessed how their country was destroyed and partitioned by Muslims and this has made them sensitive to foreign influences. They can’t do much about Islam anymore but they want to prevent a similar takeover by the Christian. So it is really because of their bitter experience with Islam that they have become intolerant of any alien ideology.
In my book I have also explained how Islam influenced the Catholic Church and how the crusades and the Inquisition are the Church’s version of jihad and mihnah. It may sound strange, but it is a fact that if the Christians burned witches, it was because the Church had become Islamized.
It may sound extremism and only a few years ago I would have thought the same way as you do. Now, I understand Islam better. Now I know that this religion is the most evil influence in the world and much of the violence and intolerance that we witness among non-Muslims is the backlash or the copycat of Islamic violence.
This sounds so radical and so extremist that I don’t expect you to accept it, but just keep it in your mind and wherever you see Muslims are victimized, dig deeper and try to find what started it. Eventually, you will agree that what seems extremism is the correct view.
Think about it logically. Can an ideology invented by perhaps the most evil human who ever disgraced this planet, that promoted so much hatred, that glorified violence, deception, even rape and murder have no negative influence on its followers? It is inevitable for those who follow Islam to do evil things to others without provocation. And it is inevitable that their victims respond in kind.
If you expect me to tell the victims of Islam to be patient and tolerant, I am not going to do that. Islam grew because of this misplaced tolerance. The bully understands one language alone and that is the language of violence. He speaks that language and respects it.
Humanity has no other choice but to get rid of Islam. This cult is a disease. It must be removed. Muslims must pull their fingers out of their ears and listen. The message is that Muhammad was a con man and they are misguided. They must abandon that evil cult and stop spreading hate in the world. They must denounce the violent verses of the Quran, which consist of most of it, if they want to co-exist with the rest of mankind in peace. You can’t be my friend when you believe that I am filthy and it is your duty to slay me whenever you can. Denounce these evil teachings and I am here ready to embrace you like a brother.
If Muslims ignore this and continue their invasion, their raids and their deceptions, we have no other choice but to stop them. Jihad means war. Personal jihad is a deception. Greater jihad is a charade. Jihad is only one thing and that is fighting with body and wealth, slaying and being slain, to advance Islam. Any other definition of jihad is a lie.
When your enemy is an extremist you need to become an extremist. My objective is to wean Muslims from Islam and help them to come to our side. I want to break the walls of hate and make them see we are one people, that Muhammad was a liar. Like Hitler and Marx he was only a prophet of hate. But if all fails, I want the rest of the world to be ready and stop the advancement of Islam.
We are always ready to embrace you. As soon as you drop your sword and remove your hatred, as soon you denounce that Quran that calls for our murder, we are ready to be your friend. How can we be friends when every day you recite verses that tell you I am the worst of creatures, that you should not take me as your friend even if I am your brother or father, that you have to hate me in your heart even though you smile on my face to deceive me, and other delightful things like these?
Yes it is extreme, but is it unreasonable? Am I asking too much when I say do not teach your children that I am a filthy kafir and that he will be rewarded if he kills me? Can we possibly be good friend when you believe the fastest way for you to go to heaven is to slay me, that my wife is yours to enslave and to rape?
Let us be honest my friends. We cannot accept Islam and we cannot accept you as long as you hold unto its evil teachings. Let us end this hypocrisy. If you want to be my friend, denounce the Quran. We can’t have it both ways. If you still want to hold to that demonic book of hate, then it is clear that you are my enemy and I will deal with you as such.
I am not promoting hate. I am tearing down that veil of deception. I want to truth to be known. Both Muslims and non-Muslims must realize what is at stake. I am sure many Muslims don’t hate the non-Muslims as it is expected from them. I want them to know the truth about their religion and to leave this cult of hate. But those who still want to cling to their faith, are not our friends. We should know them and never turn out back to them or they will stab us the moment we least expect, just as Muhammad Ali al-Ayed stabbed and killed his friend Sellouk.
Al Ayed was a 23-year-old Saudi millionaire’s son living in America, one August evening, in 2003, called Sellouk, his old Jewish Moroccan friend and suggested they get together. The two had drinks at a bar before going to Al-Ayed’s apartment about midnight. There he took a knife, stabbed, and nearly decapitated his friend. Al-Ayed’s roommate told police the two were not arguing before Al-Ayed killed Sellouk. The reason for this cold-blooded murder was “religious differences,” said Ayed’s attorney.
As long as you are a Muslim, we cannot and we must not trust you. Anyone who does so, does it at his own peril.