I have written extensively about Islam being a false religion and Muhammad a mentally sick man who deceived the gullible folk for his personal gain. I have made a series of charges against him being a rapist, a mass murderer, an assassin, a pedophile, etc. All these charges are backed by evidence found in the Quran and hadith. A comprehensive expose of all Muhammad’s crimes is presented in my book. And I have invited Muslims to read it and disprove them. Lest anyone accuse me of using this to sell my book I am offering the older edition of my book for free in PDF format. The latest edition is a lot more comprehensive, but I know Muslims will rather eat dirt than buy anything written against Islam, so the older edition is free for them.
The charges are irrefutable because the evidence given is taken from the Quran, hadith and sira, the three original sources of the Quran. I made these charges over a decade ago, and kept collecting more evidence that are now presented in my book Understanding Muhammad and Muslims, 6th edition.
To encourage Muslims to take my challenge seriously I offered $50,000 reward to anyone who can prove me wrong. I got many responses from anonymous Muslims who know nothing of Islam. The problem is that they all rehash the same thing and the debates became boring and unproductive. So I made it a rule that if my contender is not a known scholar of Islam, they should first read my book if they want to debate me. Regular Muslims can still win the prize, if they can convince a scholar to disprove my charges. In that case each will win $50 k.
This was not a bad decision, since I get occasional requests from Muslims who ask me to send them the free version of the book and promise that they will write back to show my errors and prove me wrong. Generally I never hear from them again. A small percentage write back to say how the book shook their faith and present me with a list of questions. They generally leave Islam. I never hear back from the majority.
Recently a Muslim on Twitter calling himself Chameleon_X, said my charges cannot be disproven because it is impossible to prove a negative. I told him I have provided enough evidence to prove my case. My charges against Muhammad are not baseless slanders. They are backed by authentic texts from Islamic sources.
He promised he would read and prove me wrong. I was not holding my breath. Truth can’t be refuted. I was surprised when he wrote to say he has read the book and is writing his rebuttal as a prelude to debating me. This would have made him the first person to want to refute my charges after reading my book. I was curious to hear what he had to say.
But when he was done, he named it “review,” and disclaimed that what he has written is NOT a rebuttal. “I have already stated that my review is not intended to be any refutation of the author’s clown show.” So what this Muslim has filled 131 pages of? “This is a lampooning exercise,” he confessed. In the absence of logic, appeal to ridicule is what most losers do. My challenge is: refute the charges I made against Muhammad. I know Muslims can be good clowns. Not only this Muslim did not refute my claims his 131 page write up is not even a review of my book. His reasoning consists in (I paraphrase)) “I am going to slander you of narcissism, pedophilia, etc. Since you can’t disprove something I haven’t proven, you lose and I win.” This is how a slave of Allah reasons.
The strategy of this slave of Allah is to discredit my challenge by charging me, and my colleagues, Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller of the same charges I brought against Muhammad. He then offers $3,300,000 to anyone who can disprove him. Now it is not that he actually accuses us of such things. He wants to make a point that a negative cannot be refuted.
The fallacy of the argument of this educated slave is evident to a five year old child. For me to disprove his accusations against me he has to prove them first. Are there any confessions by Robert, Pamela or me that we killed someone, had pedophilic relations with a minor, or raped anyone? Is there a reliable report on such things against us? Are there any pictures? Where is the evidence? Since he has not provided any evidence then his charges don’t have to be refuted. They are mere slanders. On the other hand I have provided ample evidence from the Quran, the haith and the Sira proving each and every claim I made against Muhammad. For example, there are over a dozen of hadiths that say Muhammad married Aisha when she was six years old and had intercourse with her when she was nine. These hadiths, narrated by Aisha herself, with the strongest chain of narrations and reported by the Sahih hadith show that Aisha was playing on a swing when her mother took her hand, washed her face and brought her to Muhammad to be wed to him; that she did not know what is going on when Muhammad took off his pants and her clothes off from her; that her friends used to come and play dolls with her and they hid behind the curtains when Muhammad came to the room, etc. Likewise, there is a lot of evidence in the Quran and hadith that Muhammad raided people, massacred unarmed men and raped their women. The charges I am making against Muhammad are not baseless slanders. For example I can’t say Muhammad was homosexual, because there is nothing in the Quran or hadith to back such a claim. But the fact that he was a rapist, a misogynist, a pedophile, an assassin and a mass murderer are evidenced from the Islamic sources.
If we follow the logic of this slave, no charge against anyone can be proven ever. Now the absurdity of this argument is self-evident. Even Muhammad, despite being an ignoramus and uneducated man of the seventh century knew that charges can be proven. For example, he said to prove the charge of adultery the accuser must produce 4 adult men as witness. This condition can rarely be met. Rapists generally don’t rape their victim in public. So the condition is a joke. Nonetheless, that benighted prophet at least knew that charges must be accompanied with proof and if that condition was met, the punishment would become applicable. Our educated Muslim does not have even the wits of his illiterate prophet.
Is he really this dim witted? Of course not! His grasp of English reveals that he has a university degree. Why would an educated person say such absurdities? It’s because he is ready to sacrifice his dignity, intelligence and make himself a laughing stock in order to defend his beloved prophet. He must be intelligent enough to know his argument is flawed.
He did not write those 131 pages to refute me. He wrote them to lampoon me. That is enough for Muslims. Now they can brag that Ali Sina is refuted and pass this ridiculous paper to each other and feel happy that someone has finally answered me, even if by the writer’s own admission it is not a refutation.
He wrote, “the author (Ali Sina) tried to avoid the utter humiliation of my counter-challenge by stating that I first have to have evidence to support these accusations. What an irrational dolt. No, I don’t.”
Really? One does not need any evidence to support one’s accusations? So was Muhammad a liar to say anyone who brings the charge of adultery against someone must prove it or they should be flogged?
“Those who accuse married women of committing adultery – but are not able to prove their accusation by producing four witness, must be flogged eighty lashes. Never accept their testimony thereafter because they are sinful,” (Q. 24:4)
I don’t know whether this slave actually read my book. I doubt it. Had he read it, he would have at least attempted to refute one of the charges. Instead went on to make up 33 charges against me and other anti-Islam writers, admitting from the outset that he is just making them up.
My charges remain uncontested. I am still waiting for a Muslim to write something intelligent and prove once and for all that what I say about their prophet is not true. That of course cannot happen.
Here is the link to what this Muslim wrote. http://issuu.com/islamophobiadebunked/docs/alisinabookreview