Converted to Islam for a Woman

Mine field says:

be prepared to lose your identity. They will give you a Muslim name and expect you to act and live like a Muslim. Uncles and cousins cant wait to tell you and *guide* you on about this *fantastic true*religion. Never mind the majority do not understand what they read in that book.Malay women are usually more uptight about their religion even if they are not fairly treated by their men. They truly believe in the rewards of a good and obedient Muslim wife. Will take in all the crap done to them by their men in order to attain that *golden umbrella* award for an exemplary wife .That Paradise is under the feet of the husband – is something they believe with all their heart. They maybe highly educated but are a confused nut case bunch – caught between covering themselves up. like their Arab sisters but at the same time also craving the Western lifestyle. Its so bizarre- they will attend a wedding or some event or even work, all fully covered and the next time you see them at the mall – head UNcovered and wearing the tightest of pants or leggings and blouses with heavy make-up ??? You are seduced by their doe-eyed Asian female femininity ….bla..bla..bla of course. But have you thought about your kids? They will be brought up as Muslims and subject to suffocating indoctrination to get Islam inside their head in the schools and every thing else in their life socially, if you were to stay in Msia . They are more concerned about what their family, relatives and society think of them then anything else. If you are not able to pray perfectly for instance, like a good Muslim, she will be responsible for it. Imagine the pressure on the relationship! Their religion comes above everything else even her love for you trust me. There is a lot of hypocrisy going on but they dont care as long as they keep the Muslim facade. If you can play along with the game you will be fine but do you really wanna?

Demsci says:

" if you see a Muslim like that, blame the one not Islam.. "

Can do that. But if by the same token we see Muslims behave nice and moral, we can say:
"If you see a Muslim like that, praise the one, not Islam".

I mean you can't dismiss bad influence of Islam just like that while you take good influence of Islam for granted.

Ali Sina says:

Nothing happens without a primal cause. This is a universal law. If we do nothing Islam will survive for thousands of years and will continue destroying the lives of millions. But we can stop it in a very short time. We need to make the movie about him. So find someone willing to support my project. No one can keep his faith after seeing for himself what a rascal Muhammad was. And they can't say the movie is all lies because at the bottom of the screen there will appear the source of the story. They can then go and verify it for themselves to make sure the story is not fiction but facts taken from Islamic sources.

There is no need to become frustrated. I can easily envision the end of Islam and the money I need to make the movie is not much.

greygandalf says:

I am with you 100%. The death cult of Islam, the blood that needs to be shed for Allah. "Alluhah Akhbar" means "Blood for Allah , Blood for Allah, Blood for Allah, Blood for Allah".
The ancient cult of blood sacrifice – still going to this day. 1400 years after the criminal , himself died, but he encode all his criminal activity, into the criminals handbook, the Koran.
And how, exactly, because you ask the question does that work??? search TROP

greygandalf says:

Momo, that is a typical brain-dead-muslim response (I don't think you deserve a capital).

Just insult at a stupid level, the level of a brain-washed zombie ,no attempt to take on a genuine challenge.
Ha -ha!

Who is the coward!

Ali Sina says:

Save your anger and read more. There is a big chance that you will leave Islam. This happened to countless Muslims, including myself.

Achmad says:

Dear Samantha
Introduce me from Indonesia.
My name is Achmad 
Before I was Muslim.
I decided to leave Islam for approximately 3 years ago.

Now you can say each respect.nantinya when Muslims feel they already have a lot of followers will surely begin to move beyond them to slaughter other people, because in Islamic tolerance is essentially haram! Her facts what? Islam was only teaches hate on other people outside Islam.What well with the murder of other people and forbid them to worship with destroying houses of worship can be justified? Islam justify it, while other religions such as Christianity, hindu and buddha does not justify it is. do not you will be doing jihad with churches bombed later? And destroy the disbelievers at that time.

For me a better person but soulless precious stones worship rather than worshiping God but do violence.violence it just belongs there Setan.Jika god I like it better than having no religion depraved religion like Islam.

Actually I do not want to demonize Islam.

I would like to ask a question for you:

Is the God worshiped by Muslims that has the power? When has, why he should tell his people to fight the unbelievers with their hands when he could do so with his own hands?
Are you able to explain?
So !!!

samanthafl says:

Hi Eric, 
I've read some harsh and nasty comments here about Islam, and everyone's entitled to their opinion. I was once a catholic until I met my husband and he didn't ask me to convert when we got married. However by the time goes by, I've built a deeper understanding about Islam and have been through life experience to find Islam and I don't need to read some articles made by some ignorant to prove me that I'm wrong. I only believe that God is one, Allah and nobody has ever seen Him. He's the One and Only, no parents and no son/children. No picture ever made to describe Him, only some arabic word to say ALLAH. I learned that other religion, always has pictures of their God, like Budha, gods in Hindu, Jesus in Christian and catholic. That's when I know, this is the simple fact about the existence of God. Faith is something beyond people's understanding, and we should respect each other's. By the way ALI SINA, I have read your articles here, and nothing can change my mind about leaving Islam. 

Guest says:

Not quite everything. There is a case where Muhammad was proven wrong by his followers, when he gave wrong advice on how to inoculate date palm. The hadith shows the human side of Muhammad and demonstrates that he too could make mistakes, which would not have been the case if everything was divinely inspired. The hadith also reports Muhammad's statement that the followers knew better than he in worldly affairs.

I-HATE-ISLAM says:

Guest,
Given that everything Muhammad did/said was/is regarded as having been divinely inspired, the comparison is quite appropriate.

Guest says:

//There is no evidence that circumcision, which was a Jewish practice, had become part of the pagan tradition to which Muhammad belonged.//

I got the following that may help. Check this link: http://www.answering-christianity.com/king_heracl…

(Translation of Sahih Bukhari, Revelation, Volume 1, Book 1, Number 6)"
…

The sub narrator adds, "Ibn An-Natur was the Governor of llya' (Jerusalem) and Heraclius was the head of the Christians of Sham. Ibn An-Natur narrates that once while Heraclius was visiting ilya' (Jerusalem), he got up in the morning with a sad mood. Some of his priests asked him why he was in that mood? Heraclius was a foreteller and an astrologer. He replied, 'At night when I looked at the stars, I saw that the leader of those who practice circumcision had appeared (become the conqueror). Who are they who practice circumcision?' The people replied, 'Except the Jews nobody practices circumcision, so you should not be afraid of them (Jews).

'Just Issue orders to kill every Jew present in the country.'

While they were discussing it, a messenger sent by the king of Ghassan to convey the news of Allah's Apostle to Heraclius was brought in. Having heard the news, he (Heraclius) ordered the people to go and see whether the messenger of Ghassan was circumcised. The people, after seeing him, told Heraclius that he was circumcised. Heraclius then asked him about the Arabs. The messenger replied, 'Arabs also practice circumcision.'

…

vijay says:

I am a mortal and unable to understand the Holy Kuran or words of the God. I am a sinner of first grade and full of ego and envy.

I-HATE-ISLAM says:

Chuck,
If he had been born with a congenital defect, we all know that it would have been held as another evidence of his extra ordinary nature, The hadiths would have been awashed with it. But there is no record on which such a possibility can be based. So what is left is the option that he was circumcised like any other human being. And that could either have taken place at birth or childhood or later on in life. For the former to hold, it has to be shown that it was the practice for Arab children to be circumcised for he alone could not have been singled out for the ritual.. There is no such evidence. Neither is there proof of adult circumcision. At what point then was he circumcised if he was not born with it, was not circumcised at birth or as a child or as an adult?

chuck says:

@Guest,
//As you sai, that is a completely different topic. We are discussing circumcision.//
I am just rebutting your assertion that a massive apostasy could have been caused, as if it didn't happen. Well if you know about the Riddah wars you know that apostasy at a big scale did happen. Just saying.

Guest says:

@chuck,

If we follow the prescription of the two ayats you quoted, we may still live in caves today. Trees would remain trees — no furniture created out of their timber. Clay would remain clay — no ceramics. Therefore, circumcision does not violate the ayats. In my view, inferential evidence for Muhammad's being circumcised is stronger than his being uncircumcised.

chuck says:

@Guest,
//probably people would apostate massively//
And in fact they did. There were the Iddah Wars which immediately followed Muhammad's demise. I am not suggesting whether lack of circumcision was a reason but merely pointing that there indeed was a major wave of apostasy immediately later.

Guest says:

My response to you is similar to the one I gave chuck. Since Muhammad promoted circumcision, him being circumcised is not a finding to be reported. But it would be headlines of the day if the funeral bathers found him uncircumcised, and probably people would apostate massively. Therefore more logical inference is that he was circumcised.

I-HATE-ISLAM says:

Guest,
Circumcision was a Jewish custom but there is no evidence to suggest that the prevailing pagan culture, of which Muhammad was a part, had imbibed the practice. If it had been, then there would have been no need for its enactment or re-enactment by Muhammad who would have been circumcised either at birth or in childhood. The alternative would have been for him to be circumcised as an adult. Still there is no record to back this up otherwise Aisha, the muhammadan encyclopaedia, would have voiced it as an example which others would be compelled to emulate. Aisha voiced her indignation at the husband's philandering with people's wives until the 'proper verse was revealed'. It is not likely that she would have kept quiet over the husband's late circumcision. None of his wives or companions who saw Muhammad's private part said that he was circumcised. The inference is that he was not.

chuck says:

@Guest,
As I said, there is no evidence to suggest that he was circumcised either. And since Quran doesn't instruct so, it is valid to assume that that the Quranic Allah didn't seem it important enough to make this part of its revealations. Considering that it is also not mentioned in the Sunnahs we can assume that he may not have been circumcised. As such this amount to "Evidence of Absence".

chuck says:

@Guest.
In a way it is evidence of absence that he was circumsized. More about the logic here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_absence

I-HATE-ISLAM says:

Guest,
Yes, I can.
If he had been circumcised the quran would have mentioned it and there would have been no need for him to make a law regarding it. It would have flowed from the existing culture or tradition. But then again, he would have abolished it as having been part of the 'pagan' tradition of the "period of ignorance". Circumcision of males was something he introduced but which was not tried on him.

Guest says:

Can you show evidence that Muhammad was not circumcised?

Guest says:

Dear Luke, she converted out of Islam to marry you. Not because she believed in the religion. Your wife's case was similar to that of Eric's younger brother.

Guest says:

Vijay is right. Eric's younger brother can go to Singapore. Vijay is also right that Allah SWT is not dependent upon who becomes a Muslim or not. Are you quoting the Quran, Vijay?

Guest says:

Dear Eric, no one in Malaysia will chop anyone's head for leaving Islam. Being a Malaysian yourself, you know this much better that I do.

Guest says:

Dear Eric, your brother will be received with an open arm and heart by the family of his Malay wife. He will be a bit different from you, eg. he will not eat pork and drink alcoholic beverages; he will go to mosques,etc — but other than that he will remain your beloved younger brother. Please allow him to continue expressing his love to you. His marriage to the Malay girl is not doomed to be a disaster, it may turn out to be a happy marriage whose happiness may extend to people around it. Nothing to be pessimistic about.

Guest says:

Hi Agracean, I do not think he is a wuss. He proudly declares himself being a Muslim, teaches Islam, and spends much of his time promoting aspects of Islam. He is intelligent and is a man of integrity. Both Muslims and non Muslims respect him highly and appreciate his contribution. He is apparently aware of those things you call despicable lies.

Agracean says:

Hi Guest, he is a moderate muslim, meaning that he only accept and practices the good teachings of this deadly cult while at the same time, turning a blind eye to all the despicable lies and atrocities committed by this devil's last prophet. In other words, this moderate muslim is a wuss.

adam says:

congratulation to his brother l pray his family also convert.

Tedjusant says:

If he leaves the marriage he will certainly lose his head?_

Agracean says:

Dear Mr Sakat, what do you mean by 'one will become intelligent under the shadow of Buddhism'?

Siti Kasim says:

Dear Sakat, You may be right in the origin of Islam here. That is now history and we got to live in the present. As I have said before in reply to the previous commentator, I promote and support freedom and that include freedom of religion and from religion. Just do not force others.

Sakat says:

I appreciate your openness,this was not the situation some 500 years back.The whole of Malacca and Indonesian Archipelago was thriving with Buddhism , really the scientific and true way of life (I do not use term religion to it ,that doesn't fit to it) and whole area was prosperous and peaceful.One will become intelligent under the shadow of Buddhism.Look at Japan ,Korea,China,Thailand ,Taiwan etc,Malayan's were equally intelligent when they were Buddhist, but now you see ,the Malay economy is thriving because of ethnic minorities and not because of Malay people.You people are suffering now because of single man's lust for a woman of Arab origin,the king of Malay.He converted to Islam only to marry that girl and later passed the ordinance that, every Malayan must embrace Islam .This religion is ideal for thug,s ,robbers,pedophile etc anti social people ,there is no scope for your intellectual development under this cult.If your people desires to make Malay a prosperous country ,revert back to your real Dharama that, is Buddhism.Thanks for sharing the facts and ,of course your emotions.

Siti Kasim says:

Dear Ali Sinna,

I am compelled to write this as I feel people are not aware of the true situation in Malaysia. I am a Malay woman. By law, being born a Malay automatically makes you a Muslim. It doesn't matter whether you are a believer or not. Being Malay as a race in Malaysia is synonymous as being a Muslim. It is written in our Constitution. I know, it is most bizarre but that is another story. Indeed, it is impossible to leave the religion via our civil laws.

Anyway, I write to defend in belittling the man who married this Malay woman. I don't know the whole story but I can say generally what happened in this kind of scenario, he converted, I believe, not because he was forced by the woman but by the laws that we have now. It is a very oppressive law and very unwarranted but there you go, if you fall in love with a Malay woman in Malaysia, the man must convert if they want the marriage to be legally recognised. All Malay people are governed under the Syariah laws that covers Family matters. Although there are attempts by some quarters to widen the net and even proposal to implement Hudud here. Again, that is another story.

Many marriages that I personally know in this circumstances, did it purely for paper sake. Their lifestyle don't change at all. It is merely to fulfill the legal requirements. So, please dont judge him nor the woman as they are tied under this archaic law which forces people to convert no matter what their reason in doing so. The Islamists rather have quantity than quality. They are proud when they announce to the world how many Muslim followers they have but what they do not know, they are belittling and made a fool of Islam as many are forced and coerced in becoming one.

I am telling you this from my personal experience and because I am born a Malay, I am trapped in this situation where I would have to 'force' a man to convert to a religion that I personally question myself in order to be married. To leave the country is out of the question as I am from a humble background.

So, I do hope that readers would understand further the dilemma that we, Malaysian Malays are going through.

Thank you.

Luke says:

I am an Indan, married to a Malay woman. She converted out of Islam to marry me. We have three grown up children who are all atheist. Go out of the country and convert out and get married.

I-HATE-ISLAM says:

Chuck, you are quite right. The scriptures say that the deviants will go to hell. That is why Christ never advocated that the Gospel be spread through violence or be forcibly imposed on people.Rather HE urged the disciples to do good and if they were rejected anywhere all they had to do was to shake the dust off their feet so it would be a testimonial on the day of judgment. HE never advocated nor practiced violence. HE never had a single soldier let alone an army to plunder and subjugate other people. Even when taken prisoner by the Romans and Jews prior to the crucifixion, HE was still benevolent by re-attaching the ear of the soldier which was severed by Peter. Muhammad, on the other hand, Muhammad ordered for the beheading of Zayyanab who had poisoned the meat served to him and his companions. There are billions of light years between the two people, just as there is a marked difference between day and night.
Leana knows the truth but thinks that it is obligatory to defend the indefensible.

I-HATE-ISLAM says:

Leana, let us compare JESUS with Muhammad:
Jesus healed, Muhammad maimed
Jesus raised from the death and gave life, Muhammad killed in his thousands,
Jesus fed, Muhammad plundered
Jesus gave His life and is the Messiah, Muhammad sought to preserve his by asking others to die
The examples of Jesus have brought happiness to the world, the examples of Muhammad bring misery.
Jesus brought love and peace, Muhammad brought hate and war.
JESUS came and built, Muhammad came and destroyed.
Jesus pointed the way to salvation, Muhammad led the way to hell
Jesus taught to love one's neighbour as one's self, Muhammad taught to love only muhammadans,
JESUS came for all mankind, Muhammad divided the world into two: that of war and islam.

yeezevee says:

"………..habeer · 4 weeks ago
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!……………….. ALI SINA FOOLISHNESS EXPOSED ………………..!!!!!!!!!!!
1)
#Muhammad said, the polytheists are unclean (Q. 9:27)…………………..

I DON'T KNOW WHAT HAPPENED TO SINNA?,HE SAY " Muhammad said," HE DON'T KNOW THE BASIC KNOWLEDGE OF ISLAM&QURAN ,THE QURAN FROM ALMIGHTY GOD ALLAH,NOT FROM PROPHET [S]………………………..

2) THE VERSES FROM NOBLE QURAN 9:27 SAYS " 27. Then after that Allâh will accept the repentance of whom He will. And Allâh is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful……….."HERE WHERE IS MR.SINA QURAN SAYS " polytheists are unclean "??????????????????????/

PLZ SHOW ME ……………………………….

Shabeer .. Grink Beer, go to this link http://quran.com/9/28 and read this..

[img ]http://c00022506.cdn1.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/9_28.png[/img]

"…Sahih International:

O you who have believed, indeed the polytheists are unclean, so let them not approach al-Masjid al-Haram after this, their [final] year. And if you fear privation, Allah will enrich you from His bounty if He wills. Indeed, Allah is Knowing and Wise………….

star says:

You are a liar ! We believers of God are the generous people. V give everyone irrespective of kafir muslims or good human beings, they are non-muslims. You are a liar ! Your Imams have pot belly. They may be having something else in their belly other than intestine, because you all are violent people, human blood suckers. Haters, liars . you all lust women. You are followers fof satanic allah. who submits you, uses you for his destructive goals. You all are brain dead zombies.

chuck says:

@Shabeer,
//@Abu Bakr into giving him a 6 yr old near toddler in marriage//
You first make up your mind about the issue. The links give contrasting theories.
The first link tries to rephrase Moiz Amzad and Zahid Aziz. Both of which have been repeatedly trashed. And if you want I can trash it again.
The second link tries to legalize marriage at the age of 6 and sex at 9. This you have already tried once (in a separate post) and the end result was that Aisha must have been a hormonally disbalanced abnormal lady. Now you can agree that she was abnormal, I don't know what that makes the Mother of Believers!!

chuck says:

//sex with their captive women//
Don't equate sex with a captive woman with marrying a slave. Or may be that is your Islamic teachings.You see no difference between a captive woman and a slave and between rape and marriage!!
And all this talk about eradicating slavery are mere words. The fact is the Arabic muslim countries are the last when it comes to abolishing slavery. Per Ibn Khaldun: "the Black nations are, as a rule, submissive to slavery, because (Blacks) have little that is (essentially) human and possess attributes that are quite similar to those of dumb animals". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_slave_trade
Muhammad may have given some lip service about slaves being equal, but he himself had God knows how many slaves.

chuck says:

@Shabeer,
//PLZ STUDY THE ARABS HISTORY ,WHEN U GOT A FREE TIME ,THAT WILL LEAVE U'R IGNORANCE /FOOLISHNESS FROM U'R BRAIN//
So do you certainly deny that there are three kinds of Arabs? The ancient Arabs, the Pure Arabs and the Arabized Arabs? Only the Musta Ribah are Ishmaelites. The Pure Arabs are Qahtanites from Yemen. Unfortunately for you, I am well versed in history in general while you are just a copy paster.
Pick up the Muqaddima by Ibn Khaldun and read it cover to cover. http://religionresearchinstitute.org/Mohammad/ish…

Do you have a geneology of Muhamad?

shabeer says:

TRUTH ABOUT THE PROPHET MUHAMMED[SA]
The Scientific Miracles of the Prophet Muhammad Sayings http://www.islamreligion.com/category/35/
Evidence of Muhammad’s Prophethood http://www.islamreligion.com/category/38/
ISLAM AND HUMAN RIGHT
PROPET MUHAMMED(SA) GREATEST: http://www.islamhinduism.com/prophet-muhammad/23-… http://www.call-to-monotheism.com/i/u/6103974/f/p… http://www.call-to-monotheism.com/i/u/6103974/f/T…

@ Why was he an orphan at such a tender age?…………..
THAT NOT VALUABLE REASON FOR CRITICIZE PROPHETS[SA],PEOPLE BORN WITH /WITHOUT FATHER /MOTHER IS QUITE NATURAL…….WE DON'T KNOW THE ALLHA LOGIC
@highway robbery…..
@thief……….
STEALING/THEFT/ROBBERY PROHIBITED
BUKARI 1.3.91,(4.52.65),4.52.308
Dawud :: Book 38 : Hadith 4367 ,73,74,75,77,82

Theft is Haraam (forbidden) according to the Quran, Sunnah [sayings of Prophet Muhammad ] and Ijmaa’ (scholarly consensus). Allaah, the Most Exalted, has condemned this action and decreed an appropriate punishment for it. The Hadd [i.e. the legal punishment prescribed by the Sharee'ah (Islamic law)] for a thief is to cut off the thief's hand. Allaah Almighty Says in the Noble Quran (what means):

“[As for] the thief, the male and the female, amputate their hands in recompense for what they earned [i.e. committed] as a deterrent [punishment] from Allaah. And Allaah is Exalted in Might and Wise.” [Quran 5:38]

The Prophet said:

“The hand (of the thief) should be cut off for (the theft of) a quarter of a Dinar or more.” [Al-Bukhaari]

The Prophet cursed the thief because he is a corrupt element in society, and if he is left unpunished, his corruption will spread and infect the body of the Ummah (Muslim community). He said:

“May Allaah curse the thief who steals an egg and has his hand cut off, or steals a rope and has his hand cut off.” [Al-Bukhaari]

shabeer says:

@In sura 16:76 allah forbids that a slave and the master should be equal………………….WHERE IS IT?

THE VERSES SAYS ABOUT THE EXAMPLE FOR GOOD BELIEVER & BAD BELIEVER,NOT THE SLAVE & THE MASTER:WE R THE HUMAN BEING R THE SLAVE OF ALLHA…………. WE MUST LEAD THE PATH OF GOD,NEVER DEVIATE FROM HIS PATH ,THIS TOPIC ALLHA SAYS TO HUMAN BEING WITH EXAMPLE………….

75. Allâh puts forward the example (of two men a believer and a disbeliever); a slave (disbeliever) under the possession of another, he has no power of any sort, and (the other), a man (believer) on whom We have bestowed a good provision from Us, and He spends thereof secretly and openly. Can they be equal? (By no means, not). All the praises and thanks be to Allâh. Nay! (But) most of them know not.
76. And Allâh puts forward (another) example of two men, one of them dumb, who has no power over anything (disbeliever), and he is a burden to his master, whichever way he directs him, he brings no good. Is such a man equal to one (believer in the Islâmic Monotheism) who commands justice, and is himself on a Straight Path?

77. And to Allâh belongs the unseen of the heavens and the earth. And the matter of the Hour is not but as a twinkling of the eye, or even nearer. Truly! Allâh is Able to do all things.

PLZ BEHAVE/BRING/CLAIM LOGIC/TRUSTFUL/BELIEVABLE ARGUMENTS,BEC'S ,PEOPLE HERE WATCHING ,THEY HAVE SENSE ORGANS & BRAIN,NOT A BLIND BELIEVERS & NOT A BRAIN DEAD ZOMBIE'S……………

shabeer says:

THE PURPOSE & REASON FOR THE FIGHT WAS MORAL ,PLZ READ THE SITUATION ALLHA ORDER THE FIGHT http://theamericanmuslim.org/tam.php/features/art…

Why are non-Muslims not allowed in the Holy cities of Makkah and Madinah?

1. All citizens are not permitted in the cantonment area
I am a citizen of India. Yet, I am not permitted to enter certain restricted areas
like the cantonment. In every country there are certain areas where a common
citizen of that country cannot enter. Only a citizen who is enrolled in the military
or those who are connected with the defence of the country are allowed in the
cantonment area. Similarly Islam is a Universal Religion for the entire world and
for all human beings. The cantonment areas of Islam are the two holy cites of
Makkah and Madinah. Here only those who believe in Islam and are involved in
the defence of Islam i.e. the Muslims are allowed.
It would be illogical for a common citizen to object against the restriction on
entering a cantonment area. Similarly it is not appropriate for non-Muslims to
object against the restriction on non-Muslims against entering Makkah and
Madinah.
2. Visa to enter Makkah and Madinah
a. Whenever a person travels to a foreign country he has to first apply for a
visa i.e. the permission to enter that country. Every country has its own
rules, regulations and requirements for issuing a visa. Unless their critera
are satisfied they will not issue a visa.
b. One of the countries which is very strict in issuing a visa is the United States
of America, especially when issuing visas to citizens of the third world. They
have several conditions and requirements to be fulfilled before they issue a
visa.
c. When I visited Singapore, it was mentioned on their immigration form –
death to drug traffickers. If I want to visit Singapore I have to abide by the
rules. I cannot say that death penalty is a barbaric punishment. Only if I
agree with their requirements and conditions will I be permitted to enter the
country.
d. The Visa – The primary condition required for any human being to enter
Makkah or Madina is to say with his lips, La ila ha illallah Muhammed ur
Rasulullah meaning that ‘there is no God but Allah and Muhammed (pbuh)
is His Messenger.’

What is the place of the NON MUSLIMS in Islam?

According to Islam, the righteous people from the Jews and Christians will have their Great Reward from Allah Almighty and will enter Paradise. Let us look at the following Noble Verses:

"And there are, certainly, among the People of the Book [Jews and Christians], those who believe in God, in the revelation to you, and in the revelation to them, bowing in humility to God: They will not sell the Signs of God for a miserable gain! For them is a reward with their Lord, and God is swift in account. (The Noble Quran, 3:199)"

"Not all of them are alike: Of the People of the Book [Jews and Christians] are a portion that stand (For the right): They rehearse the Signs of God all night long, and they prostrate themselves in adoration. They believe in God and the Last Day; they enjoin what is right, and forbid what is wrong; and they hasten (in emulation) in (all) good works: They are in the ranks of the righteous. (The Noble Quran, 3:113-114)"

"Those who believe (in the Quran), and those who follow the Jewish (scriptures), and the Christians and the Sabians,- any who believe in God and the Last Day, and work righteousness, shall have their reward with their Lord; on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve. (The Noble Quran, 2:62)"

"Nay,-whoever submits His whole self to God and is a doer of good,- He will get his reward with his Lord; on such shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve. (The Noble Quran, 2:112)"

"Those who believe, and do deeds of righteousness, and establish regular prayers and regular charity, will have their reward with their Lord: on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve. (The Noble Quran, 2:277)"

shabeer says:

THE T NOT "somebody's opinion " ………….FROM THE CHRISTIAN/JEW AUTHORIZED TEXT FROM THE LINK PROVED THE ARABS FROM ISHMAEL…………..EVEN CHRISTIAN /JEW AGREED IT………..WHAT MORE EVIDENCE REQUIRED FOR MY DEAR HINDU………..? PLZ STUDY THE ARABS HISTORY ,WHEN U GOT A FREE TIME ,THAT WILL LEAVE U'R IGNORANCE /FOOLISHNESS FROM U'R BRAIN …………………..

HERE THE SOLID EVIDENCE THAT WHO R THE REAL Ishmaelites,PLZ STUDY THE HISTORY WELL ,THEN COME TO HERE FOR DEBATE US: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ishmaelites http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_people

MY QURAN SAYS A PROPHET MASEEH,ISA[A] BEING DIVINE ,THAT NOT A CHRISTIAN BIBLE PROPHESIED CRUSADE JESUS…………………………

I-HATE-ISLAM says:

Shabby,
You are quoting your dumb 'prophet' as advocating the non enslavement of only muhammadans. But to him it was perfect to put non muslims in chains. Allah very eagerly sanctioned slavery.In sura 16:76 allah forbids that a slave and the master should be equal. Allah forbids slaver from taking their saves as partners and sharing the gifts he/it has given them equally with the slaves in sura 30:28. Sex slavery is instituted by allah as he/it grants approval for muhammadans to have sex with their captive women. Even in modern times, muhammadan clerics are still calling for the jihad so that they can capture, enslave and sell the vanquished.
The age of enlightenment will never dawn on the muhammadan. That is why he keeps referring to the Old Testament to justify his abominable acts without realizing that, the Jews, who were given those orders, abandoned them thousands of years before Muhammad.
St. Paul taught that in Jesus "THERE IS NEITHER JEW NOR GENTILE, MALE OR FEMALE, BONDMAN(SLAVE) OR FREEMAN". The Holy Bible teaches us that we will all give account of our deeds when we appear before the judgment seat of God. That is why the Western world abolished slavery way back in the early 19th century whereas it is regarded as allah's blessing in the muslim world. Saudi Arabia paid lip service to ending slavery as recently as 1962. But it is going on to the knowledge of the authorities who turn a blind eye. Millions of Sudanese have been enslaved and some have been ransomed with huge amounts by Christian groups. Mauritania has no problems on slavery; so the issue of abolishing it there does not arise. The Arabs are enslaving the indigenous Africans even though they are muhammadans.
All these examples are taken from allah's best of creation ,Muhammad, who knew all evil. If Aisha alone could set free 40 slaves in one day, then it is impossible to conjecture how many the brainless fool had in his entire household.
The quran commands that a man can beat his wife but not as much as he beats his slave. That tells you the condition of a slave in islam.
SLAVERY IS ALLAH'S "BLESSING TO THE MUHAMMADAN".

Serpent says:

So shabeer,did you ever find out who killed that mosquito you were so concerned about?

shabeer says:

One : Muhammad (e) had been, upto the age of forty, the most
favoured man among the Arabs. It was because he had claimed that
the Qur'an was divinely inspired and that the commandments within it
are to be adhered to, that he was hated; osctracized; and forced to
flee from his hometown.
Two : Even among his bitterestt opponents there was unanimity
about the truthfulness of Muhammad(e). It is difficult, therefore, to
believe that after living forty years of his life with utmost truthfulness,
he should venture to declare a falsehood in the name of the Lord
Creator and that he should have risked his own life for the sake of its
propagation.
Three : Men of letters were accorded a high status in Arabia.
There was not the slightest dissenting opinion among any, as regards
the lofty position of the Qur'an in its viability as a literary creation. If
he had ventured to claim the Qur'an as his own work, he would have
gained great respectability and status amongst the Arabs.
Four : There are references in the Qur'an which have criticized
certain of the actions of Muhammad (e) himself.
Five : There are also other references in the Qur’an which
reproach Muhammad (e) in the strongest possible terms.
It should be in the light of these facts that the pros and cons of
the argument that the Qur'an is the work of Muhammad (e) should
be examined.
Indeed, if a work of great literary merit is composed and is then
attributed to the name of God, there must necessarily exist vested
interests that lurk beneath. To expose those vested interests will then
be the duty of the critics. It will be on the basis of such an exposition
alone that the truth of the claim can be ascertained.

shabeer says:

COMPLETE PART OF HADEETH Muslim :: Book 5 : Hadith 2314

Abdullah reported: On the day of Hunain, the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) showed preference (to some) People in the distribution of the spoils. He bestowed on Aqra' b. Habis one hundred camels, and bestowed an equal (number) upon 'Uyaina, and bestowed on people among the elites of Arabia, and pre. ferred them) (to others) on that day, in the distribution (of spoils). Upon this a person said: By Allah, neither justice has been done In this distribution (of spoils), nor has the pleasure of Allah been sought in it. I (the Narrator ) said: By Allah, I will certainly inform the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) about it. so I came to him and informed him about what he had said. – The colour of his (the Prophet's) face changed red like blood and he then said: Who would do justice, if Allah and His Messenger do not do justice? He further said: May Allah have mercy upon Moses; he was tormented more than this, but he showed patience. I said: Never would I convey him (the Holy Prophet) after this (unpleasant) narration.

shabeer says:

[Tabaqat V. 1 p. 2] NOT TRUSTFUL AUTHORITY ………………….

TRUSTFUL AUTHORITY SAYS “O mankind!
We created you from a single (pair) of male and female and
made you into nations and tribes that you may know each other.
Verily the most honoured of you in the sight of God is the most
righteous of you and God has full knowledge and is well acquainted’’
(Qur’an 49:13).

chuck says:

@Shabeer,
Jesus still has a geneology, Muhammad has none. He can't trace his lineage from Abraham and so can't even claim to be a Messiah. Jesus at least is a descendant of King David on both tracks and thus satisfies the Messianic prophecies of being a Messiah!! Moreover the purpose of Matthew and Luke is different. What more geneology can also be traced from the maternal line. Point of the matter is Muhammad doesn't qualify to the Messianic prophecies!!!

shabeer says:

JUST ONE QUESTION:

Genealogy of Jesus claim by Mathews and Luke are different.

Father of Joseph yakube born 24th generation of sons of Salomon (Mathew1:6 to 16)

Father of Joseph heli 39th generation of sons of Nathan (Luke 3:23 to 31)

There are two contradictions:

1)24th generation (Mathew), 39th generation (Luke)
2) Who was father of Joseph? Yakube (Mathew), heli (Luke)

What is the truth? What we believe?
From the gospel the only thing is Either Joseph has two fathers Or Luke or Mathew layer

I-HATE-ISLAM says:

Shabby, you said "HERE PEOPLE CRITICIZE ISLAM WITHOUT PROPER EVIDENCE FROM SCRIPTURES……". Which scripture are you talking about? The quran is its own judge. Jesus taught us to love our neighbors irrespective of creed or circumstance. But the quran says love only muhammadans and hate unbelievers. Jesus taught that we should not hurt another person. But the quran says unbelievers are to be exterminated. The Torah says there should be no vengeance. But the quran harps on retaliation. God taught love but allah does not know anything like love. The quran says you should follow the earlier revelations. Since the quran contradicts the earlier revelations, it stands condemned and rejected. PERIOD.

Knowall says:

Yes, Shabeer, give your "beautiful" teachings to the Taliban and the suicide-bombing Pakistanis. Urgent ! you must go now and save many innocent lives.

Sakat says:

Ha,ha,ha.In what way you are superior? ,you don't know how to drill the pettroliam from the well ,ha,ha,ha you need others help(infidels especially) We know how to make you our slave (robot) and, also know how to make you eat our excrement thoroughly ,ha,ha,ha.

vijay says:

[youtube QjM7wlw6WtU http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjM7wlw6WtU youtube]

vijay says:

There could be a great numbers of illiterate who can say some poetic lines and can be good. Great examples could be so called lower castes Bhakthas(devotees) of Hindus during the medieval periods. Holy Vedas are derived from the term of listening. There were people who use to remember the whole Vedas, Surname of Dube/Dwidi, Tiwari/Trivedi, Chube/Chaturvedi are derived from the people remembering the whole books. They were written down much latter. To know the divine knowledge, one may not have to be literate or illiterate. People reading lots of books may not be wise but person knowing the love becomes wise. One so called lower caste Muslim Saint Kabirdas Ji said. After prolonged meditation, prophet PBUH gained spiritual literacy . It is equal to the Prince Siddhartha becoming the Buddha. His meeting with Al Khidr,(St George) is symbol of something similar to the meeting of Lord Jesus and John The Baptist. But present day Muslims hardy follow the Prophet PBUH . By reading reading and reading the books and getting intellectual teaching from Ulemas(who are the present day Jews, like ass laden with the books). They are totally zero with the spiritual literacy . Such things are common among many so called non Muslim religious preacher also.

aj7 says:

if i say i'm illiterate and still can reply your comment, would your believe that these are the words of god and i'm gods prophet? and Qur'an is grammatically weird even for the standards of Arabic Language. and there are five words which do not have any meaning. why? because muhammad just drew some lines which did not make any meaning. why would god not tell his prophet the meaning of some words? this is because muhammad just made those words by himself. My brother, you should come out of your circular logic.

Slave of Prophet says:

_// you are so proud of being an Arab why don't you get lost from India//
Because After Gazwa-e-Hind king of Indian subcontinent will be an Arabs. Indian origin Muslim have not guts to run the country properly. So, I have also chances to be ruler of India because of my Arabic origin. We will act and rule in India as per directions of the king of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arbia is center of Islam all country will have to follow the instructions & guidelines as per Saudi Arabia to run the country. That will be highest state of ruling. In India perhaps Ali Garh University which has flag resemble to Islamic nations and they do not sing even national anthem of India because it belongs to non-believer (Hindu culture and origin) but we need to implement same laws in every school, universities and institutions.

chuck says:

@Shabeer,
Do you or do you not agree that what I have posted earlier is from Quran? If yes, then Sina's point is proven irrespective of whether he quoted the correct verse numbers!!

chuck says:

@Shabeer,
Here is another Hadith:
Shahi Muslim
Book 005, Number 2314:
Abdullah reported: On the day of Hunain, the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) showed preference (to some) People in the distribution of the spoils. He bestowed on Aqra' b. Habis one hundred camels, and bestowed an equal (number) upon 'Uyaina, and bestowed on people among the elites of Arabia, and pre. ferred them) (to others) on that day, in the distribution (of spoils).

chuck says:

@I-HATE-ISLAM
//Just as an aside,it strikes me that you are not the author of that part of your comment in lower cast//
It is very apparent. Shabeer's English is pathetic, in fact pedestrian, so when he publishes a comment with such exotic words as "parochialism" and "smithereens" you can be sure that he is copy pasting.

I-HATE-ISLAM says:

Shabby, I thank Dr Sina for his contribution. In al-Mustadrik and Fayd al-Ghadir Muhammad said:"LOVE THE ARABS FOR THREE THINGS: BECAUSE I AM AN ARAB,THE QURAN IS IN ARABIC AND THE LANGUAGE OF PARADISE IS ARABIC". When Muhammad described an Ethiopian as having a head like raisin, was he equating the Ethiopian to an Arab? You have already said that it is only when it comes to muhammadanisn that all peoples are equal. Outside of that some are regarded as superior to others. Even within the faith, there is inequality as the sunnis claim precedence over the other sects and vice versa. There are blacks in Saudi Arabia, who are muslims, if they are equal to the Arabs, when will one of them be made king or even minister?
I am an African and I have heard tales of how blacks are treated in Saudi Arabia. A Briton of Somali descent regretted his experiences there. He is, of course,a muslim. This attitude of superiority dates centuries back. Ibn Khaldun wrote:"THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO ACCEPT SLAVERY ARE THE NEGROES, OWING TO THEIR LOW DEGREE OF HUMANITY AND THEIR PROXIMITY TO THE ANIMAL STAGE". As if the Arabs were not savages. Till date no muhammadan has repudiated that insane assertion nor admonish ibn Khaldun. You can deceive the uninformed about islam not giving superiority to any race. But some of us know far better than that.
Just as an aside,it strikes me that you are not the author of that part of your comment in lower cast.Another example of deceit!

shabeer says:

Did Waraqa Ibn Nawfal Teach The Prophet?

Assalamu-alaikum wa rahamatullahi wa barakatuhu:

Waraqa is one of the four men who left the pagan faith of Mecca as mentioned in this article in search for the Hanifite roots ( the religion of Abraham(P)) and returned as a Christian. Even he was claimed to be the source of the Qur'ân. Some missionaries depended on hadîths narrated in Sahih al-Bukhârî:

Narrated 'Aisha(R): Volume 4, Book 55, Number 605:

"..The Prophet returned to Khadija while his heart was beating rapidly. She took him to Waraqa bin Naufal who was a Christian convert and used to read the Gospel in Arabic Waraqa asked (the Prophet), "What do you see?" When he told him, Waraqa said, "That is the same angel whom Allah sent to the Prophet) Moses. Should I live till you receive the Divine Message, I will support you strongly."

The other hadîth is:

Narrated 'Aisha(R): Volume 1, Book 1, Number 3

Khadija then accompanied him to her cousin Waraqa bin Naufal bin Asad bin 'Abdul 'Uzza, who, during the pre-Islamic Period became a Christian and used to write the writing with Hebrew letters. He would write from the Gospel in Hebrew as much as Allah wished him to write. He was an old man and had lost his eyesight. Khadija said to Waraqa, "Listen to the story of your nephew, O my cousin!" Waraqa asked, "O my nephew! What have you seen?" Allah's Apostle described whatever he had seen. Waraqa said, "This is the same one who keeps the secrets (angel Gabriel) whom Allah had sent to Moses. I wish I were young and could live up to the time when your people would turn you out." Allah's Apostle asked, "Will they drive me out?" Waraqa replied in the affirmative and said, "Anyone (man) who came with something similar to what you have brought was treated with hostility; and if I should remain alive till the day when you will be turned out then I would support you strongly." But after a few days Waraqa died.

Waraqa was an old man and died shortly after Muhammad(P) had received the revelation of the Qur'ân; as clearly can be read from the above hadîth. While the revelation of the Qur'ân continued for more than twenty years after the death of Waraqah bin Nawfal, the Prophet(P) was receiving the revelation in different places and even while he was among his Companions. Also, he was answering direct questions raised later by the Jews in Madinah. In addition, the Jews and the disbelievers of Mecca would be very pleased if they knew for sure that there was a knowledgeable person who was teaching Muhammad(P) the Qur'ân.

And finally Waraqa himself announced in all of the hadîths reported in Sahih al-Bukhârî that he would support Muhammad(P) strongly if he lived long enough:

"Should I live till you receive the Divine Message, I will support you strongly."

"if I should remain alive till the day when you will be turned out then I would support you strongly."

It is not surprising to see that when these points are brought together, Christian missionaries start to take refuge in the excuses that Waraqa was a heretic or on whose authority he said that he would support Muhammad's(P) prophethood?

shabeer says:

Can it not be claimed that the Qur'an’s has been but the composition
of Muhammad (pbuh) himself ?

Prophet Muhammad (e) had lived in the light of history. It
was through him that the world first heard of the Qur'an. As such, all
that may be asserted by those who do not accept the divine status of
the Qur'an is that it is the composition of Muhammad (e). There are
however, certain facts that must be understood as the premises for
this discussion. It can only be on the foundations of these premises
that the question as to whether the authorship of the Qur'an can be
attributed to Prophet Muhammad (e) can be discussed.
One : Muhammad (e) had been, upto the age of forty, the most
favoured man among the Arabs. It was because he had claimed that
the Qur'an was divinely inspired and that the commandments within it
are to be adhered to, that he was hated; osctracized; and forced to
flee from his hometown.
Two : Even among his bitterestt opponents there was unanimity
about the truthfulness of Muhammad(e). It is difficult, therefore, to
believe that after living forty years of his life with utmost truthfulness,
he should venture to declare a falsehood in the name of the Lord
Creator and that he should have risked his own life for the sake of its
propagation.
Three : Men of letters were accorded a high status in Arabia.
There was not the slightest dissenting opinion among any, as regards
the lofty position of the Qur'an in its viability as a literary creation. If
he had ventured to claim the Qur'an as his own work, he would have
gained great respectability and status amongst the Arabs.
Four : There are references in the Qur'an which have criticized
certain of the actions of Muhammad (e) himself.
Five : There are also other references in the Qur’an which
reproach Muhammad (e) in the strongest possible terms.
It should be in the light of these facts that the pros and cons of
the argument that the Qur'an is the work of Muhammad (e) should
be examined.
Indeed, if a work of great literary merit is composed and is then
attributed to the name of God, there must necessarily exist vested
interests that lurk beneath. To expose those vested interests will then
be the duty of the critics. It will be on the basis of such an exposition
alone that the truth of the claim can be ascertained.

Ali Sina says:

@Shabeer

"the authority of quran is my almighty god Allah ,he says the first part of the sura yasin [Yaseen the heart of quran,"

That is circular reasoning. If the Quran say it is the word of God it does not mean it is. It means Muhammad lied again. The Quran is the word of no one but Muhammad who claimed it is the word of God. He was a liar. There is no evidence that the Quran is the word of God. There is plenty of evidence that it is not.

Slave of Prophet says:

@Intelligent lad
What your Guru Ali Sina is doing? He has no work and engaged in bashing Islam all the time. It is his profession to criticize Islam and get donation from the non-believers for his livelihood.

shabeer says:

the authority of quran is my almighty god Allah ,he says the first part of the sura yasin [Yaseen the heart of quran,that means the most important sura from quran

noble quran

36:1. Yâ-Sîn.

2. By the Qur'ân, full of wisdom (i.e. full of laws, evidences, and proofs),

3. Truly, you (O Muhammad SAW) are one of the Messengers,
4. On a Straight Path (i.e. on Allâh's religion of Islâmic Monotheism).

5. (This is) a Revelation sent down by the All­Mighty, the Most Merciful,[no doubt about it]
6. In order that you may warn a people whose forefathers were not warned, so they are heedless.
7. Indeed the Word (of punishment) has proved true against most of them, so they will not believe.

10. It is the same to them whether you warn them or you warn them not, they will not believe.

11. You can only warn him who follows the Reminder (the Qur'ân), and fears the Most Beneficent (Allâh) unseen. Bear you to such one the glad tidings of forgiveness, and a generous reward (i.e. Paradise).

The Qur'an is the last scripture that has been revealed to mankind
by the Lord Creator and Protector. It was through the Last Messenger,
Muhammad (e), that the world first heard of it. It certainly is the
divine scripture that is to be accepted by all, upto the very last man.

Given below is a list of some of the evidences in support of the
divine nature of the Qur'an:

1. It , itself, declares that it is a divine Scripture
2. It shall remain unchanged upto the Last Day.
3. The path of right conduct that it prescribes is faultless.
4. It is practicable.
5. The history that it teaches is faultless and honest.
6. Its literature is incomparable.
7. The prophecies made in it can be seen to have come true.
8. The references in it to the varied phenomena of nature, as
representing the signs of God, are free of controversies.
9. There is no reference, whatsoever, of an unscientific nature in it.
10. It is free of all contradictions.
11. None has been able to take up the challenge it poses when it calls
forth all, and any, to produce an equivalent of at least one of its
chapters.
12. The person who was appointed with it in the world was himself of
a truthful and selfless nature.

more evidence for who r the authority of quran?
http://www.nicheoftruth.org/pages/responses_home…. http://authorityofquran.blogspot.in/ http://authorityofquran2.blogspot.in/ http://authorityofquran3.blogspot.in/
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explor…

SECOND PART NOT ANSWERED ,PLZ AVOID THE BLINDLY/EMOTIONAL CRITICIZING ISLAM…………PLZ POST THE CORRECT THE QURANIC VERSES THE…………PLZ GIVE SOME CHANCE TO THINKING /SENSUAL/LOGIC REASON FOR CRITICIZING RELIGION……………….

chuck says:

Exactly my words @I-HAT-ISLAM.

Sakat says:

Trading started because of communications ,in the beginning it was bartered system,however language was needed as a tool for communication . communications begin with the advent of language and, the last leg was writing or documentation of thoughts(bringing communications into practicality through script) .If there is no means of writing ( pen and paper and of course how to use them),does that make any man illiterate.Barter system was a prerogative of an illiterate bargainer that's all and ,rest is history .However this MAD MOHAMMED was totally illiterate in every aspect that is a truth and,will always remained till eternity ,that is certain.

kirana says:

Hi Mr.Sina,

Thank you, I'd love to get that pdf version and I'll get your book for him (the good thing is he likes reading)

I-HATE-ISLAM says:

Slave, there were no universities in Arabia of Muhammad's time. Even skilled labor was carried out by non Arabs like the rebuilding of the kaaba which was done by an Egyptian Copt. But that is not to say that there was no kind of formal education. Warraqa, Khadijja's cousin, was able to translate some parts of the New Testament from Hebrew and Greek to Arabic. Muhammad acquired some bit of education. In one of the hadiths, it is said that on his death bed, he had asked for writing materials to write down the name of his successor but his strength failed him before the writing materials were brought. Why was an illiterate looking for writing materials? Could he not just have made the pronouncement in the presence of witnesses and that would have sufficed? Still in another hadith, it is reported that when Aisha was told that Muhammad left Ali in his will as his successor, she retorted:"WHEN DID HE WRITE THAT WILL?". Why did she not ask, 'who wrote the will for him?'. An illiterate is someone who cannot read or write in any language. As far as Muhammad is concerned, he could read and write. The talk of his being an illiterate was invented to mask his having plagiarized earlier works in the name of 'revelation' so that it could be said that one who could neither read nor write lacked the capacity to copy from others. Muhammadans should try harder and invent another lie for this one has been exposed.

kirana says:

@Mr.Sina,

Thank you for your advice. I've made up my mind actually, now matter what I feel now, life is long journey, and I want to live it right in my own way. I know there's a point in our life we should face hard choice, it's not about what I choose is right or wrong, but it should be what's best for me, what's suited me well. Sometimes that choice is very hard and hurt, but we must keep moving on. And that's what I chose, I left him for good since few months ago. We're kind of friends now. He's a good man, and his family are very sincere Indonesian despite their religion. It's very hard to convince him to see the real Islam, but we should never loose our hope to bring back these good people back, free from this poisonous religion, right? What you and others like you do are very inspirational and brave, you don't know it gives us hope and encourage. I shared a comment here in hope that Eric can help his brother, I really hope he can get his brother back. Again, Terima Kasih Mr.Sina

Intelligent lad says:

I think it is pretty clear that Slave of Prophet is not a Muslim but a Hindu or Christian Just enjoying bashing Islam. Muslims call themselves slaves of Allah not slaves of prophet. We should just let Muslims answer hm.

avika says:

@chuck: Trading had existed a long time before writing was invented. It mean a illiterate man can conduct trades.
@Slave:
I don't like him, not because he is illiterate (there are illiterate peoples that are good and kind), but because of what he did.

Slave of Prophet says:

@Avika
It is fact prophet (PBUH) never went to any school /university and He did not know how to read and write.

Slave of Prophet says:

@Poor Ali Sina
I am not awakened to read your comment. There are many people on the earth like you having mental disorder. As you say Gorilla your cousin, Hindu also claim cow is most beneficial animal of the world and they go so far and claim scientific benefit of cow dung, urine and milk and worship the cow as most holiest animal but that does not change the fact that Allah created such animals so that we could consume their flesh nothing more than it.
Here is proof
[6:142]
Some livestock supply you with transportation, as well as bedding materials. Eat from GOD's provisions to you, and do not follow the steps of Satan; he is your most ardent enemy.

I-HATE-ISLAM says:

Shabby, no book, no religion upholds egalitarianism more than the Bible and Christianity for we are taught that if one has two coats and his brother has none the one who has should give to the other who doesn't. That is why the Western countries are so generous as Chuck has pointed out. They rush massive humanitarian aid to disaster affected areas while the muhammadan nations sponsor destruction.

chuck says:

@Shabeer,
//THAT THE QUALITY OF KAFIR WHO LOVE THIS TOO MUCH ,THEY NEVER GIVING TO POOR PEOPLE//
Kafirs like the Americans and Western European human welfare societies which donate huge amounts of money to disaster hit countries like Pakistan. Never heard of Saudi or Iran to donate money to Pakistan for example. Kafir nations like India which 'donated' 650 million rupees to Pakistan in 1947 so that they kick start their economy (and use a part of that money to attack Kashmir!!).

shabeer says:

ALLHA TESTING THE MOST BELIEVER HIGHER THAN THE NORMAL BELIEVERS,THAT MEANS ALLHA EXAMINE THE TRUE BELIEVERS TOO…………………………..SO THAT PROPHET SUFFERING MORE THAN US…………….

shabeer says:

#He urged his followers not to associate with their fathers and brothers if they don’t convert to Islam (9:23)
23. O you who believe! Take not for Auliyâ' (supporters and helpers) your fathers and your brothers if they prefer disbelief to Belief. And whoever of you does so, then he is one of the Zâlimûn (wrong-doers, etc.).
HERE THE WORD " Auliyâ " USED FOR “Wali” and “Auliya”. Let me post all those meanings here.

Wali – protector, helper, friend, guardian, supporter etc

Auliya – lords, gods, protectors, helpers, guardians, supporters……………………..THE MUSLIM AULIYA SHOULD BE A MUSLIM ,NOT A KAFIR……………………….SUPPOSE WE HAVE TO COMPLETE A PROJECT WHO WHO WAS OUR BOSS IS ANY FOOLISH ,HE DON'T KNOW AT LEAST A LITTLE BIT KNOWLEDGE ABOUT OUR PROJECT SUBJECT OR A PERSON HE TAKEN Ph-D ABOUT IT……………………A MUSLIM AUYLIYA MUST BE A MUSLIM………………….KAFIR AUYLIYA MUST BE A KAFIR………….

BUT A MUST RESPONSIBLE FOR HIS PARENT& RELATIVE ,HE MUST BE KIND , FULFILL THEIR RESPONSIBILITY & RIGHT[OTHER THAN RELIGIOUS MATTERS]
Asmaa’ bint Abu Bakr was the Prophet’s sister-in-law. She was the daughter of his closest companion and the sister of Aisha, his wife. Her mother, however, did not become a Muslim for quite a long time.Asmaa’ states: “My mother came to me during the time of the Prophet (Pbuh), hoping to get something from me. I asked the Prophet (Pbuh) whether I should be kind to her. He answered: “Yes,”
(Related by Al-Bukhari, Muslim and others).
Qur’an: As for such of the unbelievers as do not fight against you on account of your faith, and neither drive you forth from your homelands, Allah does not forbid you to show them kindness and to behave toward them with full equity. Indeed, Allah loves those who act equitably. (Surah Al-Mumtahinah 60:8)
It is clear from this Qur’anic verse and the Hadith quoted above that to show kindness to parents who are non-Muslims is also a duty on children, provided that such parents do not fight against Muslims, and do not chase them out of their land. This is further supported by a Hadith which mentions that Umar saw a silk suit being sold in the marketplace. He suggested to the Prophet (Pbuh) to buy it in order to wear it on Fridays and when he received delegations from other tribes. The Prophet (Pbuh) said: “Only a person deprived (of goodness) wears such a suit.”

Some time later, the Prophet (Pbuh) received a number of similar suits. He sent one to Umar. Umar asked. “How can I wear it when you have said about it what you said?” The Prophet (Pbuh) answered: “I have not given it you to wear it, but to either sell it or give it as a present.” Umar sent it to a friend of his in Makkah who was not a Muslim. This Hadith suggests that kindness to unbelievers is also recommended if they do not take an attitude of active hostility towards Islam.

I-HATE-ISLAM says:

Shabby, the quran was written by Muhammad. One of his own scribes said so to his hearing and added that if revelation could come to Muhammad then he might as well claim to be a prophet. Read your sura 1 which is the 'mother of suras', and you will see Muhammad talking. Would any sensible God call on himself to worship himself and be guided by himself along the right path? That is precisely what your sura al-fatiha or the opening is advocating. When allah talks about being guided to avoid getting lost, then he/it cannot be God. The conclusion is that Muhammad was allah and vise versa. Almighty God cannot be lost. Only man can, as Muhammad was.

shabeer says:

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!……………….. ALI SINA FOOLISHNESS EXPOSED ………………..!!!!!!!!!!!
1)
#Muhammad said, the polytheists are unclean (Q. 9:27)…………………..

I DON'T KNOW WHAT HAPPENED TO SINNA?,HE SAY " Muhammad said," HE DON'T KNOW THE BASIC KNOWLEDGE OF ISLAM&QURAN ,THE QURAN FROM ALMIGHTY GOD ALLAH,NOT FROM PROPHET [S]………………………..

2) THE VERSES FROM NOBLE QURAN 9:27 SAYS " 27. Then after that Allâh will accept the repentance of whom He will. And Allâh is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful……….."HERE WHERE IS MR.SINA QURAN SAYS " polytheists are unclean "??????????????????????/

PLZ SHOW ME ……………………………….

3)HE SAYS " fight those who don’t believe in Allah and the Last Day (9:28)."
ACTUALLY WHAT THE VERSES SAYS "28. O you who believe (in Allâh's Oneness and in His Messenger (Muhammad SAW)! Verily, the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh, and in the Message of Muhammad SAW) are Najasun (impure). So let them not come near Al-Masjid-al-Harâm (at Makkah) after this year, and if you fear poverty, Allâh will enrich you if He will, out of His Bounty. Surely, Allâh is All-Knowing, All-Wise.

THERE IS NO EVIDENCE HERE FOR "fight those who don’t believe in Allah and the Last Day"

shabeer says:

SINNER S@Y #Muslims take the side of Muslims. The question about who is at fault is never raised………..

Faith Is Imperfect without morality
Faith is such a power that it keeps men away from low attributes and mean acts, and encourages him to achieve high
attributes and clean morals. That is why whenever Allah called his slaves towards virtue or whenever He wanted them
to hate evil, He declared it as an essential requirement of the Faith in their hearts. For example when He; in Surah
Taubah, commands men to adopt righteousness and to speak truth, He addresses them as
“0 you who have faith” (or “O you who believe”):“0 you, who have faith I Fear Allah and be withthe truthful
people.”
(Taubah.. 119)
Allah's Messenger has nicely explained it that when faith is firm and belief is strong, then strong and lasting moral will
be developed, and if the moral character is low then faith will accordingly be weak.
A man, who is immodest and ill-mannered and who adopts bad habits without caring for others, is like the person about
whom the holy Prophet has said:
“Modesty and faith are twins. One who gives up one has to lose the other too.”
Once the Prophet passed by an Ansari who was scolding his brother about his immodesty. The Prophet advised him to
let him go as modesty was a branch of faith.
A man who harasses his neighbour and makes him suffer any kind of damage is called cruel and stonehearted by the
religion. In this connection the decision of the Prophet is :
“By God, he cannot be a Momin ; by God, he cannot be a Momin; by God, he cannot be a Momin. He was asked:
'who' 1 He answered: 'He from whose misdeeds his neighbour is not safe.' “
-(Bukhari)
No person will be punished for the sins of another. Each person will be brought to account for his own sins. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“And no bearer of burdens shall bear another’s burden”[Faatir 35:18]

“God forbids you not, with regard to those who fight you
not for (your) faith nor drive you out of your homes, from dealing
kindly and justly with them: for God loveth those who are just.”
(H.Q. 60:8)
“God only forbids you, with regard to those who fight you
for (your) faith, and drive you out of your homes, and support
(others) in driving you out, from turning to them (for friendship
and protection). It is such as turn to them (in these circumst
ances), that do wrong.” (H.Q. 60:9)

someone says:

When I watched this video vhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1JIKOMQV5A I realized where from
Mohammad got his ideas.

Ali Sina says:

@Slave.

So you know about these hadiths and still think that despicable man was a prophet? Have you any sense of decency left in you? Anyone who knows about the above hadiths and still thinks Muhammad was a prophet should not be called a human. What is wrong with you? You know that Muhammad raided innocent people in the middle of the night. You know that he massacred unarmed men, women and children to steal from them. And you still are a proud slave of this despicable criminal? Let me tell you my friend that if there is a hell you will be going there without a doubt. There is no room for stupid people and for evil worshipers in paradise.

Ali Sina says:

@Kirana
If I were you I would leave this boyfriend. Most Muslims are not practicing but most Muslims are fanatics when it comes to Islam. Islam is also a religion of deception. This boyfriend of yours can lie to you in order to marry you. He would say that you can keep your faith. But once married he will coerce you to covert. Your life will be as hell whether you marry him or not.

I suggest you tell him that the only way that you’d marry him is that he leaves Islam, not for you but because he should realize it is a deception and very evil. Ask him to read my book. If he reads it he will most likely leave Islam. If he refuses to read it please leave him for your own sake. You are a smart woman. You know you have only one life and you know love weakens one’s resolve. So don’t marry this man unless he reads my book and leaves Islam.

If he doesn’t want to buy my book, which is available in Kindle format from Amazon.com, I can send him the older edition in pdf.

As for you, I suggest you watch the movie Not without My Daughter on Youtube. You will see how Muslims lie and how they have a very sinister and evil face that they hide. You deserve better than a Muslim husband.

kirana says:

Hi Eric,
I'm Indonesian, a non-moslem who is in some sort has the same situation with your brother, but not quite same. I have a moslem boyfriend, even he is not a good 'moslem' since he never practice Islam at all he at many times encourage me to convert into Islam. He knows that I had good christian upbringing even now I won't call my self christian, I've abandoned church for so years now, and he sees that as a good chance to lure me into Islam by asking my hand in marriage. But what he doesn't know that, I've known Islam and I maybe know Islam better than him even I don't speak arabic language or read Koran. I've learned Islam from my sunday school time, differently with moslems who learned Christianity to judge it and to promote hate against it, I was taught of Islam by my sunday school teacher in respect and to understand it. And in my understanding Islam is harsh and full of hatred and terrors. In Indonesia, even it is secular country, inter-religion marriage is prohibited by law, and my boyfriend use this excuse many times, that one of us have to convert with the emphasize that it's a common thing that a woman should follow her man (so typical). I loved him so much and that's every woman's weakness, even I know Islam, I think if I want to be with him, I should give up my faith, myself. So, I learned more about Islam in the sense that that there must be good in it, if not why it has almost 80% of Indonesian follower which most Indonesian proud that they are the biggest moslem population of the world, I even practiced the shalat and all, he and his family so happy with that, but the truth is I followed him not because I believed in Islam, but because I want to marry him, it's a torture at the end, and total hell to me as i should go against my rational senses. And one day, I just woke up in realization, that I won't live in such hypocrisy and as a hypocrite for the rest of my life, this is my life, and I only live it once, and I want to live it right and as myself. So I told him one day, I am not christian, and i'm certainly not a moslem, and I won't make mistakes that I will regret for the rest of my life, I love you, but if to marry you I have to marry your religion, then I'm sorry, let's end it up here and now. it struck him with surprise, but he didn't say anything but that he understand. He still hoping that we could marry, but he knows well I won't marry him in any religion way let alone to convert. I know he can't converted too to follow me because to what religion should he converted as I have none, and I won't let him do that because of me, as I know it's not right. I just want him to know, that to love means to respect one's choice too, if you blindly love and let it failed your rational sense, you put yourself in a very dangerous position. And there will be no way back with Islam, you can't just try it and if it's not suited you, you can leave it for good, there's no such thing in Islam. So, the only thing I can share you is to bring your brother to his own sense, try to talk to him that love has nothing to do with religion. you should make him consider that his choice will determine his fate and his life after the marriage, and there is no turning back. he should think about that, because how big or deep his love for her, his self is his own, his life is his own not hers to control or to be directed in the name of love. it will be hard for you to do that to your brother, but you must, before it's too late.

vijay says:

Can he go to Singapore permanently ? I hope you understand what i mean ? In case he is not interested in Islam, then better he does not become Muslim for a female. Allah SWT is not dependent upon who becomes a Muslim or not. If your sister in law is not ready to leave her faith, then let this marriage does not occur.

I-HATE-ISLAM says:

Shabby,
"YOU MUST GO FOR THE ONE WITH RELIGION-". Because,after brainwashing, she does not know her right from her left. She must accept whatever is presented to her without the slightest emotion. Failure to do so is taken as rebellion for which she must be whipped. What choice does such a physical and psychological slave have?

I-HATE-ISLAM says:

Your 'prophet' was in the best position to know for the first two reasons accounted for his marriage to Khadijja.

I-HATE-ISLAM says:

Just A Reader,
Interestingly, the sunni muslims consider Zakir Naik to be a salafist and non muslim. However, they do not denounce his eagerness to convert non muslims. Muslims are the same irrespective of sect.

Sakat says:

I am sorry to say my friend that,he is not your brother at all ,he was true Muslim in his earlier life .Muslims only think of sex all the time and 24/7.They don't know love ,their love drilled through sex ,and your so called brother is a good example of it .He is not doing any wrong but carry forwarding the legacy of his earlier life ,ha,ha,ha.

Slave of Prophet says:

@Ali Sina
Though, Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) said not to kill woman and children of non-believers. But if they get killed while confronting with non-believers it is forgiven by Allah.

Proof:-

Narrated As-Sab bin Jaththama:
The Prophet passed by me at a place called Al-Abwa or Waddan, and was asked whether it was permissible to attack the pagan warriors at night with the probability of exposing their women and children to danger. The Prophet replied, "They (i.e. women and children) are from them (i.e. pagans)." I also heard the Prophet saying, "The institution of Hima is invalid except for Allah and His Apostle." (Sahih Al-Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 52, Number 256)

It is reported on the authority of Sa'b b. Jaththama that the Prophet of Allah (may peace be upon him), when asked about the women and children of the polytheists being killed during the night raid, said: They are from them. (Sahih Muslim, Book 019, Number 4321)

Slave of Prophet says:

@Ali Sina
We can eat the animals flesh as prescribed by Holy Quran. Quran directs us which are the animals whom flesh we should consume and which are prohibited. I think Gorilla also can be consumed.

Innocent Guy says:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

A man used to eat much, but when he embraced Islam, he started eating less. That was mentioned to the Prophet who then said, "A believer eats in one intestine (is satisfied with a little food) and a Kafir eats in seven intestines (eats much).

Can you digest this saying of Mohammad.

Ali Sina says:

Okay babies is a different story.

Many animals seem to have a special feeling for babies that would like to save them. I saw a video of a cheetah saving a baby baboon from a hyena. T
Here it is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ix0y9j32h70

Coco, the famous gorilla who could communicate with humans through sign language was once given a kitten. She loved the kitten but when she was told that the kitty was killed in an accident, she was seen crying just as we humans do.

Animals are a lot closer to us humans that we want to acknowledge. Many of them are far more human than Muslims. It is not unheard of Muslims killing babies of the non-Muslims.

darkfire316 says:

What about this hippo trying to save a baby gazelle? Is this not empathy as well?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MrBqEslJgQg

infidel/kafir says:

SHA-BEER :: In ISLAM there is no concept of marriage . You know that. The word is NIKHA which in arabic means , penetration !!
In ISLAM everything is discriminatory against infidels,kafirs/unbelievers !!! There is no universal human value in ISLAM. That is the reason why I say , ISLAM does not belong in human civilization. ISLAM is only for demons. ISLAM is a terrible, terrible religion !!!

Eric says:

It's the law in Malaysia that in order to marry a muslim, a non-muslim must convert. Once converted, you cannot leave. Only way is to migrate to other country. We are Taoist-Confucian Chinese. Our late grandparents used to advised us not to marry those belonging to Abrahamic religions .

proudestkafir says:

Oh, you sh1tty shabby are still alive! I thought you blew up to meet the 72 houries! Never mind you are as demented as you were before!

shabeer says:

Qualities to look for in a spouse

Making sure that Muslims are well-matched in marriage is one of the most important and potentially difficult functions in Muslim society. The individual seeking marriage must have his/her priorities straight and be clear about which characteristics are most important in a spouse in order to have a successful marriage. There are many characteristics that are important in a husband or a wife but some are exceedingly more important than others. Emphasising the wrong qualities can lead to disaster down the road just as being neglectful of certain considerations can do likewise. When we come to understand the goals and priorities of marriage in Islam, we may be guided to the Islamic methodology of seeking marriage in Islam and stop blindly following the disbelievers in their ignorant notions of the importance of 'getting to know each other' and other such concepts which in reality contribute nothing to and, more often, sabotage a marriage.

Prophet Muhammad taught us in many Ahaadeeth (prophetic statements) about the various characteristics which one looks for in a spouse and their relative importance. Among those Ahaadeeth are the following: "A woman is married for her religion, her wealth or her beauty. You must go for the one with religion, may your hands be in the dust! (if you fail to heed)" [Muslim] And also: "Choose carefully for your seed (offspring). Marry those who are equivalent (or 'qualified') and give to them in marriage." [Ibn Maajah & Others]

In the following sections, we will discuss, if Allaah wills, some of the most important characteristics that can be found in the Quran and the Sunnah (prophetic tradition) related to selecting a good spouse.

Religion

Just A Reader says:

Islam's goal is to grow number. When a Muslim girl fall in love with some one from other faith they will make sure that the boy gets converted. If a Muslim boy fall in love with a non-Muslim girl they will make sure that the girl gets converted. Problem is if a non-Muslim girl gets converted no one will know anything about her any more. Entering into a Muslim family is like entering crossing the horizon of black hole, no signal can come out from there. Muslims won't tolerate any exception. Find out what happened when Maratha king Shivaji's son fell in love with Aurangzeb's daughter. He was murdered by Aurangzeb because the Maratha king did not want his son to get converted into Muslim even though he approved the marriage. A recent example is Imran Farasat. I do not see how his suffering is going to end it looks like it is going to get worse. There is a guy called Dr. Zakir Naik. It is very difficult to control laugh if you see how he tries to convert people into Islam. He conducts many seminars to strengthen faith among the young people. If any Hindu boy or girl ask him any question about Islam he asks point blank "Will you convert to Islam if I answer your question", it sounds like he is selling insurance policies. Of course religion is an insurance for after life.

jihadi says:

And if he tries to leave Islam his once friendly Muslim brothers will gladly chop his head off for him.

FoT says:

Dont worry Eric, such marriages are doomed right from the beginning. Once your brother realizes that his brainwashed muslim wife doesn't love him he will come to his senses and leave Muhammadan cult. Maybe this is even a good experience for your brother. Now he will see the true nature of Islam