Ali Sina vs. Sheila Musaji
Even though Sheila Musaji refuses to interact with me directly, apparently she reads my responses and your comments and responds on her site. She does not think it is necessary to let me know that she has responded. That is okay. Now that I know how she likes to interact, I will search her site to see her responses.
(If you have not been following this debate please start with An Olive Branch For Sheila Musaji)
Ms. Musaji commented also on my discussion with the Rabbis. She quoted my initial passages where I said much of the intolerance of Islam is owed to the intolerance in the Old Testament. She then wrote:
Sounds as if he is not only Islamophobic, but also anti-Semitic. And, a little later in this article this gem appears which shows that at the very least, he is a racist: We Persians are of the same genetic stock as Germans and we had a far superior civilization than Arabs.
It seems that Ms. Musaji has some difficulty in comprehension. I am against Islam. That does not make me Islamophobic. Islamophobia is a fallacy. You can say Islam-hater. That I agree. But one can’t be “phobic” of a belief. This is a deception. But as Joseph Goebbels, Hitler’s propaganda minister said, if a lie is repeated often it will be believed as truth eventually. A good example is “homophobia.” This is a fallacy. Homosexuality is a disorder no different from eating disorder or a personality disorder. Homosexuality is a sexual disorder, like sadomasochism, fetishism, zoophilia and pedophilia. Now these disorders are not all the same and have different implications, but they are all disorders. I am not a homophobe for considering homosexuality a disorder. Homo means same. I don’t have an irrational fear of men. But this lie was repeated so much that today most people have fallen for it. The idea was to stifle any criticism about this subject and they succeeded. It is a tyrany of thought. All totalitarian systems are fascitic and want to control and manipulate your thoughts Now they even have gay pride parades, as if there is something to be proud of a disorder. This is how masses are manipulated through propaganda. They shame you into silence. Few people dare to say homosexuality is not normal. If they do, they will be called biggots. They even gave it a chichi name: “gay”, meaning happy. This is also a lie. Homosexuals are not happy.
Muslims are using the same deceptive tactic. They want to stifle the legitimate discussion about Islam. So they invented this lie and with the help of their leftist lackeys who gave us the fallacy of homophobia they will repeat it until it is seen as truth. But Islam is an ideology. No one can have an irrational fear of an ideology. You can strongly disagree with an ideology and you can even hate it, but you can’t be phobic of it. Ideologies don’t have fangs. It is their believers who may have fangs. Now, it would be more logical to say Muslimphobia. Muslims can hurt you. If you see a group of Muslims coming out of a mosque, you would be wise to run as fast as you can. This poor Hindu in Bangladesh was not Muslimphobic. He passed in front of a mosque when the worshippers of Allah had just finished their Friday prayer and were coming out of it. They grabbed him, they dragged him inside the mosque, they beat him until he died.
It is a fact that people are developing Muslimphobia. They are not becoming Muslimphobic because of what I write, but because of what Muslims do.
What is the best representative of Islam? The Quran or Muslims? Of course every Muslim will agree that the Quran is the best representative of Islam and Muslims don’t represent Islam at all. Well I have a copy of the Quran on my shelf next to me. I am not afraid of it. But I will be afraid if a Muslim shows up in front of my door. I think this is true for everybody. So it is clear that Islamophobia is a lie. Muslimphobia is debatable, because phobia is irrational fear and there is nothing irrational about fearing Muslims.
Musaji also calls me anti-Semitic. Why? Just because I exposed two hatemongering rabbis and showed the nonsense written in the Bible? She is incapable to distinguish beliefs from people. I am a Zionist. I have defended the rights of the Jews as a people to go back to their ancestral land and be left alone. Israel was a historic necessity. What happened in Europe seventy years ago to this people would never have happened had they had a place to call home where they could take refuge. Many of them sailed to other countries but were denied entry. Six million of them were gassed and incinerated. We cannot allow that kind of holocaust again and that is why Israel exists.
Today that the number of Muslims in the west is on the rise, Jews are again under attack. This time the treat to their lives comes from Muslims. That is why Israel is necessary and as long as there are Muslims, Israel must be protected.
Now, let me make a concession. If one day all Muslims give up following Muhammad and give up their natural hatred of the Jews, I will no longer see a need for Israel. On that day we all can live in harmony and peace.
But being a Zionist does not mean I agree with the Bible. Why should I? That is a book of fables. Adhering to it makes people biggoted and hate mongers like those two rabbis. Blind faith makes one intolerant.
I care about people’s rights, not about their beliefs. I don’t care about any belief, not even mine. You are most welcome to attack my belief. Beliefs don’t have a right. Humans have rights. And the foremost of all human rights is freedom of conscience, which cannot exist without freedom of speech. People are free to believe in what they want and criticize what they want. This is the foundation of freedom. Without the freedom to criticize beliefs there is no freedom.
You also called me racist because I said we Persians had a superior civilization to Arabs. Again you are engaging in a logical fallacy. You want to equate cultures with people. Some cultures are not culture at all. They are barbarity. A “culture” that practices stoning, amputates the limbs of common thieves, beheads its detractors, considers the minorities as second class citizens, regards its women as sex object and calls them awrat (walking-talking vagina), is not equal to a culture that upholds equality for all its people, irrespective of their faith or gender and practices democracy and freedom.
All cultures are not equal. Cultural relativism is another leftist fallacy. We Persians had a much more superior culture than the Arabs. But after the invasion of Islam we were reduced into barbarians. We became like them. Now we are all barbarians. The first charter of human rights was written in Persia more than 2500 years ago. Today Iran is one of the top violators of human rights. If not to Islam to what else shall we attribute this devolution?
It is not racist to say Muslims are savages any more than to say Nazis were savages. Islam is an ideology. It is not hacked into our genes. We can give it up and regain our civility. That is the whole purpose of what I do. Muslims are drowning in the cesspool of Islam. Just look at the pictures of Muslims when protesting in the streets. If not savages what they are. Are they civil? Is this what civilized people do? I want to pull them out of Islam and restore their civility and their humanity. Yes they are not even human anymore.
Most Jews have given up their belief in the nonsense of their religion a long time ago. Most of them don’t believe in religion anymore. Those who do are like those rabbis, filled with bigotry and hate. But they are the minority. Even when Jews go to synagogues it is for ceremonies. Religion can be a cohesive force. It brings out the spirit of fraternity and builds community.
The thinking Jews take the Bible with a lot of salt. I don’t object to that kind of religion. I know many Jews, Christians, Hindus and people of other faiths that are beacons of light. I don’t agree with their religions, but they are my brothers and sisters in humanity. If people believe in goodness, if they promote unity among all people, if they don’t discriminate against others on the basis of what they believe, they are my brothers. Those two rabbis don’t represent the Jews. Several Jews wrote to me and said that those guys are not even Jews. They are messianic Jews. In other words they are Christian evangelists posing as Jews to convert other Jews to Christianity. If they are really disciples of Jesus, they are doing him a great disservice.
You may say there are many Muslims who are moderate too. Yes there are, but the problem is that they, and if not they, their children are at risk to revert to the pure Islam of Muhammad and that is when they become dangerous. I am not saying good humans among Muslims don’t exist. Of course they do. Somone mentioned Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam who was the president of India as an example of a “good Muslim.” Dr. Abdul Kalam is not a good Muslim. He is a good human. In fact he is a very bad Muslim. Khomeini was a good Muslim. There are many good people born among Muslims who even think they are Muslim but they are wonderful human beings. However, if you examine their lives you’ll see that they violate the teachings of Muhammad. They use their own conscience as compass and not the Quran and the Hadith. They are good people because they are bad Muslims. The reverse is also true. The more a person tries to follow Islam and emulate Muhammad the more evil he becomes.
People of other faiths don’t believe that their scriptures are the verbatim words of God – I mean the thinking people. Jews and Christians believe that the Bible was written by inspired men. When you read the Bible it is clear that it does not claim to be the word of God. This allows the believers of these faiths to use their own judgment and reject the parts of the Bible that are not savory. Jews don’t practice stoning. As far as we know they haven’t been practicing this barbaric law for over 2000 years. Christians don’t regard women as inferior even though Paul made it clear that they are. Muslims don’t have this luxury. The Quran is considered to be the verbatim word of God and you can’t deviate from it. If you do for a time, it will be short lived. The mullahs can remind the Muslims that they are deviating from the Quran and Islamic extremism will be resurected.
Islam cannot be reformed. You can use it less but you can’t change it. It is like urine in drinking water. Any amount of it is toxic. In less doses it does not kill you. But the wretched Umma has been sick for 1400 years for drinking this urine. Even though Muslims have not always been as savages as they are today, they have never been civilized. The difference between you Ms. Musaji, and the types of Bin Laden is not in principle but in degree. They want the urine of Islam as pissed by Muhammad unadulterated and in its pure state, while you want it diluted with Americanism. You can’t stomach the pure Islam. To their credit they are not hypocrite, but you are. If Islam is divine why do you want to mix it with American values? Just stick to what the Quran says and Muhammad did. Bin Laden was sincer about his faith. You are not.
Criticizing cultures and beliefs is not racism. There is nothing racist in criticizing a culture that believes in slavery, practices misogyny, thinks women are deficient in intelligence and does not allow them equal rights in the court of law, in inheritance or in marriage. It is okay to denounce a culture that says don’t take people of other faith as friends and leaders (awlia). It is not racism to say Muhammad was a psychopath like Jim Jones and Hitler, don’t follow that criminal.
So as you see I am not a racist for saying Islam is savagery and I am not an anti-Semite for saying the Torah is a book of fables.
Today I had a sad revelation. My neighbor is out of town and he asked me to take care of his chickens. Every morning I let the birds out of their coop and throw on the ground a handful of grains. He said this is their treat. There are a dozen of hens and a rooster. I noticed, while the hens run to eat their treat as fast as they can, the rooster stands by and does not eat. At times he shows his hens where they can find more grains. He himself does not eat the treat. I was amazed to see these animals, of which we think so little and abuse them so inhumanely, have such a tender feelings for each other. While contemplating on the love these birds have for each other, my heart was filled with sadness by memories of my days living in Pakistan. I lived in Peshawar. This is the most Islamic town of Pakistan. When the Pashtoons invited me to their home, men and boys sat around the food and ate while women and girls stayed in the kitchen. Sometimes they peeped to see when we are done so they can take the leftover to the kitchen and eat their share. I thought to myself, there is more chivalry, more nobility and more humanity in this rooster than in some of us humans.
But why these people treated their women in such a way? If you read the Sira you’ll see this was the tradition of Muhammad. This is not culture. This is savagery. This savagery comes to Muslims through Muhammad and his mysogynistic teachings.
Let us continue:
It is both surprising and not surprising that Ali Sina has now been named to the Board of Directors of the newly formed Stop the Islamization of Nations SION which is a coalition SIOA, SIOE, and other hate groups, and which will be led by Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer. It is not surprising because of the animosity towards Islam that he shares with Geller and Spencer. It is surprising because of the fact that Geller herself is Jewish, and Ali Sina seems to have as much animosity towards Judaism as he does against Islam.
Perhaps this is above your ken but what unites Pamela Geller (a Jew), Robert Spencer (a Catholic), Wafa Sultan (a secular humanist), Babu Suseelan (a Hindu) ,and yours truly, is our humanity. We have different beliefs, but we don’t allow that to divide us. To a Muslim this might be incomprehensible. You see the world divided on religious lines. We don’t see it that way. We see all mankind as members of one gigantic human family. We have different tastes in politics and in religion. But we never let them come between us and divide us.
I receive many emails from youths who say they no longer believe in Islam and want to become Christian. I never discourage them. Let me quote what I wrote to one such youth yesterday.
This 22 year old Somali woman wrote to Pamela Geller and told her that she wants to be a Christian. She added, “However, i know that if my family [comes to] know about this they will surely end my life since it will bring them shame in our community. Once my father found a bible in my drawer and he told me that if he founds it there again he will do something to me that i will regret forever. I feel unsafe here and am looking for a way out please help me before it is too late.”
Pamela asked me to reply and here is a few passages from my email to her:
“Faith is a very personal matter. It is a relationship you have with your God. No one can take it away from you and you don’t have to speak about it to anyone. Jesus did not start a new religion. He wants to have a personal relationship with you. As long as you have him in your heart, he is with you even if you don’t attend any church or interact with other Christians.
If you live in your parent’s home, you need to live by their rules. Don’t keep a Bible at home and don’t have any cross or anything that may make them think you are a Christian. You don’t need to do any baptism either. Love of God is your baptism. Soon you will be out of your parent’s home and will be more independent.
Meanwhile I suggest you act with caution. Time will pass fast. Study hard and get the best education you can. Education is your key to freedom. If you have a good education you can get hired sooner and afford getting out of your parental home faster. You may even go and live in another city or another country.
If you want to read the Bible you can find it online. If you want to discuss your faith with anyone you can find Christian communities online. Don’t share your thoughts with anyone. Study, study and study! This is the fastest way to your freedom.”
Pamela is a Jew and I am a humanist. But neither of us discouraged this girl from following the path that she had chosen for herself. We don’t care about people’s faiths. We care about their lives. We don’t divide mankind along religious lines. There is no such thing as believers/unbelievers, the faithful and the kafir in our lexicon. What matters, is our humanity and what makes us human is not what we believe, but how we live.
You are a Muslim. You are genuinely incapable to see that we are humans first, and religion is nothing compared to the strong string of humanity that runs through the core of all of us and binds us together like the beads in a rosary. You see the world from the tainted glasses of Islam. What you don’t know is that those glasses come from the mind of a psychopath narcissist. Islam is insanity. This is not an insult. This is my thesis and I have proven it. Read my book and you too will agree.
You then continued:
The Southern Poverty Law Center published a report citing Geller for hate speech. The AFDI has been named a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center. The American Freedom Defense Initiative is the parent group of the SIOA. Spencer, Geller, and Yerushalmi are featured in the SPLC reports Jihad Against Islam and The Anti-Muslim Inner Circle.
Yes I know. These traitorous leftist organizations are your lackeys. What unites them with you Muslims is your common hatred of the Judeo-Christian western values. But they are stupid. They think by supporting fellow haters of the western values they will be stronger and you will help them to come to power. All they have to do to see their folly is to talk to fellow commies from Iran. Let them talk with Maryam Namazi from UK. Namazi and her comrades were instrumental in the revolution of 1979 in Iran. They threw their lot with Islamists. But they were the first who were eliminated when Khomeni took power. If Islam ever comes to power in Europe or in America, all those left leaning organization that today defend Islam will be the first to be eliminated. Those who don’t read the history, tend to repeat the same errors.
Pamela Geller and her organizations don’t become hate groups just because a bunch of moon-bat leftists says so. Pamela has demonstrated her compassion and care for countless hapless and helpless young Muslims whose own families have turned against them. Young Muslims write to her from all over the world asking for help. This woman should be awarded the Nobel Prize for her humanitarianism and for her compassion. Alas the Nobel Prize committee is so politicized that they think charlatans like Arafat, Obama and Al Gore are more deserving for that prize than good humans who truly serve mankind.
One of the saddest stories is when Gore was granted the Nobel Prize for lying about global warming there was a 92 years woman named Irene Sendler, who was also a nominee. She had saved some 2,500 Jewish children from the Nazi Holocaust by smuggling them out of Warsaw Ghetto, in her basket. I felt a lump in my throat when I read her story and that instead of her the committee chose this filty liar.
I don’t give a damn about those organizations calling Pamela Geller a hate monger. I can see how much she cares about people. I saw how she took to heart the case of Rifqa Bari and protected that beautiful soul when her parents wanted to kill her.
Where were you to protect Rifqa? Why young Muslims don’t write to YOU to protect them from their families and write to Pamela? Because they know you are a hypocrite Islamist and all you care is your damn religion, but Pamela is a humanitarian who cares about them and is not concerned about what religion they believe. I have seen people write to her and say they want to stay Muslim but just want to be free from the tyranny of their parents and Pamela still advised them compassionately and tried to help them without ever telling them they should leave Islam first.
Pay Pal at least temporarily suspended Geller’s site Atlas Shrugs for being a hate site.
Sure! They did it because a bunch of Muslims like you lied about her and libled her of spreading hate. When Pay Pal realized they had been duped they reversed their decision.
You then said
Spencer and Geller attempted to patent the SIOA trademark, but were refused by the U.S. patent office The government response, posted on the site, states, “The applied-for mark refers to Muslims in a disparaging manner because by definition it implies that conversion or conformity to Islam is something that needs to be stopped or caused to cease.”
That is because our Governments are misled. They consider Islam a religion and as such it is protected. That is why we formed SION (Stop Islamization Of Nations) to educate and to unmask Islam. Islam is not just a religion. It is more a political ideology of domination. It must be classified as such. It is more akin to communism and Nazism than it is to other faiths. Muhammad said al Islamo deenun wa dawla (Islam is both religion and government.) One cannot be separated from another. This is what people don’t know. It will take some time to make the world aware of it. But we are patient and determined. More prominent people are joining SION from all over the world. We are poised to become a powerful international force. And we will go after traitors who sell their country for vote. We will expose them. We know that anytime a politician supports Islam we have to follow the money trail to find a skeleton in their closet. That is what we intend to do.
The Center for American Progress released a groundbreaking report Fear Inc.: The Roots of the Islamophobia Network in America. The key researchers for this report were Wajahat Ali, Eli Clifton, Matthew Duss, Lee Fang, Scott Keyes, and Faiz Shakir. The report itself is the result of a six month investigative project, and is 132 pages in length. Geller is cited as part of this network.
Oh really!? So a bunch of Muslims and their minions got together and cited Geller as Islamophobe? And what else is new? I repeated many times that Islamophobia is a fallacy. Geller is a defender of the Western civilization.
Musaji quotes several other organizations that are either run by Muslims or are sympathetic to Islam that denounce the critics of Islam as “Islamophobe”. In her opinion this is “evidence.” In Persian we have a saying: They asked the fox who will testify on your behalf, he said my tail. Or better than that is when Allah backs up Muhammad. Who gives a damn if Muslims and their minions call us hate monger? This is circular reasoning. I talk about facts and I have shown that we are not hate mongers, but Muslims are.
The following is my response to Sheila Musaji’s response to me dated 1/26/2012.
Despite the fact that I almost always addressed her directly, Musaji never addressed me directly. This lady’s heart is so much filled with hatred of me that she can’t bring herself to call me by my name and speak to me directly. That is fine. I will speak to her directly. I have no hatred for her. She is only a misguided soul.
Dear Ms. Musaji,
I wrote a long response and asked you specific questions. For example when you said “I strongly uphold freedom of faith,” I asked you to explain the wars of apostasy in Islam and the actions of Muhammad, the Guided Caliphs, and the practice of killing the apostates in all the history of Islam and all Muslim countries. You ignored the subject altogether.
You quoted the verse 2:256 where it says there is no compulsion in religion, but ignore me when I quoted several other verses that say kill those who don’t believe. I asked you to explain the discrepancy and you chose to ignore that too.
I showed how Mawdudi has resolved the apparent contradiction and has shown that the verse about “no compulsion in religion” is just a misunderstanding. You ignored that too.
I told you about my neighbors’ rooster who in my opinion has more chivalry, more nobility and more humanity in the way he treats his hens than many Muslims who treat women so badly and I showed that this misogyny among Muslims is because of the teachings and examples of Muhammad. You ignored the subject altogether.
My response contained many important points that you ignored. Instead you took an issue when I said you have dedicated your entire energy in maligning the critics of Islam and said that had I looked more carefully I would have seen that you also write about other subjects.
Yes you are right. I take that back. You also write about other subjects. Probably I should have been more careful in the choice of my words and should have said you dedicate MOST of your energy in maligning the critics of Islam. I apologize for that. You do indeed write about other thing.
Well, when you are right, you are right. I acknowledge my error. Will you do the same? Are you capable of acknowledging your errors?
“On TAM, we regularly call out those within the Muslim community that I identify as the “lunatic fringe”, discuss various interpretations of aspects of Sharia, condemn any interpretations that violate human rights.
Good! I am happy to hear that you do that. But what if those whom you identify as “lunatic fringe” are the ones who understands Islam correctly? What if Islam and human rights are not compatible? Why is it that the ones who are more dedicated to Islam and try to practice it best are the ones that violate human rights? Could it be that there is something in Islam that contradicts human rights?
Let us see a few examples:
According to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, men and women have equal rights. Please note that functions and rights are not the same. Does Islam recognize the equal rights between man and woman? It doesn’t. I already mentioned a few examples and I can show you dozens more.
According to the UDHR all people have equal rights? Does Islam agree with this?
In Saudi Arabia the blood money for a person depends on his or her religion and gender. Here is a break down:
- 100,000 riyals if the victim is a Muslim man
- 50,000 riyals if a Muslim woman
- 50,000 riyals if a Christian man
- 25,000 riyals if a Christian woman
- 6,666 riyals if a Hindu man
- 3,333 riyals if a Hindu woman
According to this hierarchy, a Muslim man’s life is worth 33 times that of a Hindu woman. This hierarchy is based on the Islamic definition of human rights and is rooted in the Quran and the Sharia. It can be found on The Risala of ‘Abdullah ibn Abi Zayd al-Qayrawani (310/922 – 386/996), A Treatise on Maliki Fiqh. You can read the full text here.
Do you agree with this hierarchy? This is the concept of the human rights in Islam. This is the interpretation of Muslim scholars of the Quran and there is consensus. Is this your understanding of human rights? And if not on what basis you propose to change it?
The UDHR and the Islamic human rights are not the same. Based on the former, the latter is in violation. Which one you uphold?
You bragged that you converted to Islam 40 years ago and presented your conversion as evidence that there is no compulsion in conversion. I pointed out that everyone does silly things when they are young and the conversion of an inexperienced young woman is hardly a valid evidence of the truth of things that she embraces. You did not give any objective evidence to the truth of Islam. You presented you own conversion as evidence. But the conversion of a young girl can be subjective. It’s of no value to others. Then you get upset when I scuff at it as evidence. You say “This is simply a nasty, speculative, and meaningless attack on me as an individual that deserves nothing but contempt.” If you are so sensitive about it, you should not have presented it as evidence.
In this response you answered none of my arguments. You ignored my questions altogether. The only thing you talked about is how your petal delicate sensitivity was hurt when I scuffed at your evidence. Your conversion is meaningless to us. Even the conversion of a learned and wise person is meaningless, let alone the conversion of a young girl who may have converted because she had fallen in love with a Muslim guy.
So basically your response had no answers. But you had to say something. So you quoted two commentators, Sundried Atheist and Enlightened 25 to find me guilty by association.
These two individuals are not my disciples. In fact I have had several encounters with them and have chided both of them. They are more disciples of Richard Dawkins. That is why I don’t share the views of Prf. Dawkins because I see the fruit and I don’t like it. Both these individuals are anti-Semites and the former person actually thinks women should cover themselves. So go figure. They have nothing of me.
Then you wrote another article on 1/28/2012 in response to my long article (above). But you say nothing there either. You don’t address any of the arguments or bother to answer any of my questions. You merely quoted a few of my passages and summarize:
“Here is the gist of his argument: I hate Islam, but that is not Islamophobia. I believe that “Muslims are savages”, but I am not a bigot. I believe that “Homosexuality is a sexual disorder, like sadomasochism” but I am not homophobic. I believe that Judaism is a religion of “nonsense”, those who believe in it are “filled with bigotry and hate”, but I am not an anti-Semite. I believe that my culture is superior to others, but I am not a racist. Terms like Islamophobia or homophobia are lies, there is no such thing. I am sorry, but there is such a thing as anti-Semitism, there is such a thing as Islamophobia, there is such a thing as homophobia, there is such a thing as racism. You can object to the use of one or all of those words, but the bottom line is that no matter what you call this ideology, it is hateful bigotry.”
Looks like my suspicion about your difficulty to comprehend things is correct. A child understands what I wrote but you didn’t. Let me repeat.
Hating Islam does not make one Islamophobe because this word is a fallacy. One cannot fear an ideology. One cannot be a Christianophobe for example. What part of this you don’t understand?
To say Muslims are savages is stating the obvious. Stating the truth does not make one a bigot. Isn’t stoning savagery? Don’t Muslims practice stoning? There are many other Islamic practices that prove Islam is savagery. What part of this you don’t understand?
Homosexuality is a disorder and homophobia is a lie. I have no fear of men and not even of homosexuals. I don’t see homosexuality as something shameful, in the same way I don’t see obesity as something shameful. But both obesity and homosexuality are disorders. What part of this you don’t understand?
I am a Zionist. I have defended Israel since always, even before I denounce Islam. But like Einstein and Espinosa and multitude other Jewish thinkers, I don’t believe in the fables of the Bible. Would you say that Einstein was an anti-Semite? Religion and people are two different things. I am with the people, but I don’t care about beliefs. What part of this you don’t understand?
I did not say my culture is superior to others. You truly have a very poor comprehension. I said Iranian culture was superior to Arab culture before we were invaded by the marauding Muslims. Today, thanks to Islam we are just as barbarians as our invaders. Why recognizing that some cultures are superior to others would make one a racist? Can’t you see the difference between race and culture?
And yes both Islmaophobia and homophobia are lies. Repetition does not make them true. What part of this you don’t understand?
You ignored all my arguments and when you responded, you made it clear that you have a poor comprehension. You are no scholar dear Sheila Musaji. You are not an intellectual and you are not even intelligent. You are the fifth column that aims to “eliminate and destroy the Western civilization from within and sabotage their miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all religions.”
I don’t think you will respond. I think by now you must have realized that I destoryed you. The more you write the more you expose your vulnerability. But in case you decide to respond, please go to the bathroom and cough strongly. See if you can spit out that hatred that you have for me out of your chest and then go back and read what I wrote from the beginning.
This debate continues here