Science in the Quran
Dear Ali Sina,
Your book, articles and debates that I follow in your site have forced me to be reluctant to observe Islamic rituals anymore. I suppose, there must be something wrong with this asinine teaching that I have never realized before. It really pained me at first, though. However, my faith now has become nominal and I believe eventually it will dwindle to nothing. Deep in my heart I have a feeling of freedom that I have missed for years. I could see the light.
I used to be a very staunch Muslim. I would pray tahajjud every night, fast on Monday and Thursday, constantly go to masjid for a jamaah prayer near my house and read Quran almost every night.
Yet, I have a couple questions for you to ask. I hope you can help me.
A. I will move to North America for good this year and bring my family.
There is something in my mind troubling me if I live in the west someday. My son was named after Muhammad, the name that I bragged of before. As there are more people in the west will learn that Islam is evil. I am worried people will mock him for that name. Besides, by having that name people will immediately know that he is a Muslim. I feel very sorry, guilty for my son, constantly dwell and regret it to name him after Muhammad. What do you think I can do about this issue?
Hi Kamal,
I am glad to know you saw the light. You have left Islam 100%. Once you get to this stage you are no longer a Muslim. It only takes time for you to digest it, however the doors to go back are closed for good.
As for your son’s name, let me assure you no one will tease him for his name. My name is Ali and I have been living in the west most of my life. I have never experienced any sort of prejudice and discrimination because of my name. These people are not like that. Sometimes They are so accepting and tolerant that sometimes I think they are naïf and because of that they can’t see the danger. So please put your mind at rest. When you come here, try to become one with others. Integrate and learn about the culture of these people. Since you don’t have Islam anymore to stop you, you can associate with everyone and will feel very happy here.
Now, if your son decides to change his name. That too is easy. I thought about it but decided to forget it. I like my name. Ali means supreme and Sina means seeker of knowledge. You can’t have a better name. A supreme seeker of knowledge! not bad at all.
Since I read your book, I never push my children to pray or read Quran anymore if they miss like I used to do. Instead, I teach them the values about humanity that I have learned from you.
That is a great value that you are giving to your children. They will appreciate it in future and the world will be a better place because of them. Of course I can fancy that they are also my children. Letters like this make me feel that my life has not been in vain.
B. I recently stumbled on an Islamic site. There is a scholar that explains the Quran in a different way. His explanation of Quran is quite impressive that makes us think again that Quran is scientific.
I know you are a busy person. I wouldn’t expect you to respond and refute all following issues I am bringing up. Just pick up one of them that represents the fallacy of the Quran to bring my doubt about Islam back again. I believe you can do it. Then, I will pass your response to my fellow Muslims that admire this supposedly scientific Quran. But,if you want to refute all of them, it will be fine too.
Here is what he wrote in his books that
I can quote some of them.
Who revealed the Quran if not God?
If the Quran was authored by Muhammad, you must also believe in the following:
I. He knew that the earth and the heavenly bodies were once a single cohesive mass that was exploded asunder.
21:30: Are the disbelievers not aware that the heavens and earth used to be one solid and we exploded them asunder?
This is a silly claim. I have responded to it in this debate. Please see these links
http://www.faithfreedom.org/debates/alAssadip2.htm
Scroll down and read the Big Bang in the Quran
More on the same subject in the same debate
http://www.faithfreedom.org/debates/alAssadip5.htm
II. He must have known what modern science knows about the life on earth; the life originated from water and that all living beings have water in their composition.
This is not the discovery of the modern science. The knowledge that no life can exist without water has been with us since the down of human intelligence. It is one of those obvious things. Any fool of any century knew about it.
III. He must have known that the universe constantly expanding.
51:47: And it is we who have built the universe with power, and certainly, it is we who are steadily expanding it.
No he did not know this and he did not say such thing. He said the world is an expanse and he made the example of a bed that is spread out.
Please go hear and read about Expanding Universe
http://www.faithfreedom.org/debates/NaikCampbellintro.htm
You can also find another response to the claims of the Big Bang in the Quran and the joint earth and heaven.
IV.Could anyone in the middle of the desert know the existence of atoms with certainty in the 7th century?
34:3: …Not an atom’s weight in the heavens and the earth,escapes his knowledges .
This is utterly silly. The word dharah existed in Arabic language much before Muhammad and all languages have a similar word. It simply means a small quantity. In cooking you can use it when you say use a small amount of salt, or a dharah of salt.
Demetrius was the first Greek philosopher to define atom as indivisible matter. Of course he was wrong, because atom is very much divisible.
V. Even smaller than atom!
Did anyone know that until the 20th century? Did prophet have an electron microscope? Did he know that every atom has electrons and protons? Now see 10:61 has to say.
10:61: Not an atom’s weight in the low nor in the height escapes your lord’s knowledge. Nor a thing smaller or bigger,everything is recorded in clear database. [smaller than atom;who could think of electrons and protons in the 7th century].
Muslims really love self-deception. Muhammad is not talking about atom or particles. He is talking about dharah which means tiny amount and smaller than that.
Please read my responses to Dr. Zakir Naik. http://www.faithfreedom.org/debates/NaikCampbellintro.htm
You will see that all the claims Muslims make about the scientific nature of the Quran are false.
All the best
Ali
Science is first and foremost a product of theism (mono and poly).The quest for knowledge of God is what drives theists to investigate the natural and metaphysical.
During the Middle Ages, all Universities were religious institutions promoting astronomy,math,philosophy and Aristotelian logic.
Even muslims have contributed to science,in fact a muslim by the name of Alzahen is credited with pioneering the scientific method but because in Islam war supercedes all other tenets – this preoccupation with spreading Islam via jihad is what eventually and inevitably causes a regression and stagnation in muslim societies,all thanks to Muhammad.
But nevertheless,theists have always been on the forefront of scientific breakthroughs and Christian Europe’s Middle Ages is directly responsible for the scientific revolution despite the myths still perpetuated by hollywood that Christianity caused Europe to fall into a Dark Age,which has been thoroughly debunked by modern historians.
Logic,math,science and philosophy are disciplines that man can absolutely flourish without.In other words, we don’t need them for our basic survival just as animals don’t either.
Just something to ponder on.
@Maruf you are such a wise person and simply the doctor is not responding to you ! Bravooooo 🙂
88. "Verily, your Lord is God Who hath made the Heavens and the Earth in six days – then mounted His throne to rule all things." (15:3.)
C. ~ Space is not the result of combination or a compound substratum. It is uncreated, eternal. The assertion, that it was created, furnishes a positive proof of the fact that the author of the Qoran was ignorant of physics. Had God to spend full six days on the creation of the world? When it is written in the Qoran "Be'} and "it was," it follows that this assertion about the creation of the world in six days is baseless. Were the Muslim God All-pervading, why would He establish Himself in the heavens or the sky? And if God has to thing of His administration, He is nothing but a prototype of a human being. Were He Omniscient, why would He cogitate seated passively? This shows that the Qoran is he production of minds steeped in savagery and destitute of all knowledge of God.
89. "And guidance and a mercy to the faithful." (10: 55)
C. ~Is God the monopoly of the Muslims only, and have others no claim on Him? And is He partial, that He reserves His mercy only for the Muslims, and denies it to others. If by Muslims He meant "the faithful" they do not stand in need of guidance. If God does not furnish guidance to people other than the Mohammedans, His knowledge is of no use.
"That he might make proof which of you will excel in work – And if thou say "After death ye shall surely be raised again." The infidels will certainly exclaim, "This is nothing but pure sorcery." (11: 8, 10.)
C. ~ When God has to examine works, He is not Omniscient. And if He does raise people after death, are we to think that those who are raised are condemned for an indefinite period to wait for
a settlement of their date? Again, is it not opposed to His own Divine law to raise the dead? Is it possible that God should compromise His Godhead by infringing His own law? http://www.aryasamajjamnagar.org/chapterfourteen….
Really? The simple thing is what science are you talking about? One guess . . . I highly doubt you know any discipline of science.
These Day's every religion try to justify its holy books with Science and Islam the most….Why?
Simple if u can't compete them Join them….Muslims or any other religion can't compete with Science today (New Things r discovered ..everyday) so in order to held their leg above all other they start shouting…we know this its in our book…we know this its in our book…we know this its in our book…
Stupidity at peak….
Contradictions in Quran
1. Good and Evil deeds
Stand:
Good and evil deeds are not equal. Reply to bad deeds done on you with good deeds. (Surah Hamim 34)
Contradiction:
Take revenge of death for death – kill a free man in revenge of free, slave in revenge or slave and woman in revenge of woman! (Surah Bakar 178)
Allah is enemy of those who are enemy of Rasul and angels (Surah Raku 98)
I have created enmity and jealousy among them till doomsday (Surah Mayda 64)
Allah does not advise Kafirs (Bakar 264)
Be as hard with them as they were with you (Nahal 126)
Muslims, Fight the Kafirs around you so that they understand what hardness is (Tauba 123)
2. Allah knows everything
Stand:
He is beginning and He is end. He is evident and He is hidden. He knows everything. (Hadid 3)
Whatever is there is skies and earth is known by Allah (Mayda 13)
Contradiction:
That day Allah will ask Hell if she has been filled and she shall answer that there is still some space left! (Kaaf 29)
He asked Earth and Sky whether they came with happiness or out of compulsion. Both said that they came with happiness. (Sajdah 11)
Why does Allah need to ask questions when he already knows the correct answer as well as the answer that the examinees would give? Or does he enjoy drama and nautanki? But then why is drama Haram in Islam then? Or may be He cannot tolerate anyone else doing drama except he himself!
3. Relations in Paradise
Stand:
When doomsday shall come, there shall remain no more relations and they shall not talk to each other.
Contradiction:
In Paradise, they shall go along with their wives and good children. (Raad 23)
Obviously it means that relations shall continue in Paradise. Hence Quran contradicts itself.
Science and Quran are poles apart… its ridiculous how muslims interpret it…
All life forms evolved from bacteria, though their lives revovled around water (the sea ). From bacteria to worms, from worms to fishes, from fishes to 4-legged swimmers (like lizards n crocodiles} which migrated to the land to become animals n apes. And few branches of these apes mutated to become men n women. This process took billions of years.
His reply is all over in his websites. Read it up patiently with an open mind.
I wonder if there were ostriches in Arabia in the 7th century.
The answer to his question "But who will decide the ethics meaning which is bad or which is right?" Is easy morality is an artifact of consciousness. It comes from your mind so YOU decide what is right or wrong. People have different goals, some people are looking to get rich, some are looking to get to paradise, some what to increase "the wellbeing of conscious creatures" or whatever else. This is how people can see a action or situation and have a very different moral view of it because they all may have a very different purpose.
WHOLE DOCTRINE IS SHIT IF IT DOESN'T SERVE BASIC HUMAN NEEDS
ALI SINA COWARD WHY DON'T YOU ANSWER THIS COMMENT
you said "I have come to know that muslims are liars. "
When you are saying this, keep in mind the fact that Quran is the lie and the muslims are just defending it. This difference is subtle but deep.
Two of the reasons I can come up with for muslims to do it are.
1. They are true believers.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_True_Believer
E.g. The ordinary muslim folks who read through this site and are in denial
2. They are paid petrodollars.
E.g. Mullahs, Sheikhs and people occupying lucrative positions in Muslim world.
As you may know, the true believers outnumber the paid guys and their motiviations are entirely different.
http://www.answering-christianity.com/detailed_meanings_of_scientific_words_in_verses.htm
Yeah, another double speak of religionist. When they call critics as liars, they lie themselves. B)
Seraj, didn't your religion teach you not to tell lies? "Daha" comes from the source "Dahi" which means flattening, and not shaping into an Ostrich egg. Sorry but your Qur'an is wrong and there's nothing you can do about it. Also, another very big mistake in the Qur'an is the order in which the starts and the earth were created, since the Qur'an teaches that Allah adorned the sky with stars AFTER he created the earth which is a huge scientific mistake.
Earth was spread out:
Arberry: and the earth — after that He spread it out,
Muhammad Asad: And after that, the earth: wide has He spread its expanse,
Tafsir Jalalayn: And after that He spread out the earth: He made it flat, for it had been created before the heaven, but without having been spread out
Tafsir Ibn Kathir: It already has been mentioned previously in Surat Ha Mim As-Sajdah that the earth was created before the heaven was created, but it was only spread out after the creation of the heaven.
Earth is older than heaven. The heaven was designed after Allah filled the earth. Surah 41:
10. He set on the [earth], mountains standing firm, high above it, and bestowed blessings on the earth, and measure therein all things to give them nourishment in due proportion, in four Days, in accordance with [the needs of] those who seek [Sustenance].
11. Moreover He comprehended in His design the sky, and it had been [as] smoke: He said to it and to the earth: "Come ye together, willingly or unwillingly." They said: "We do come [together], in willing obedience."
12. So He completed them as seven firmaments in two Days, and He assigned to each heaven its duty and command. And We adorned the lower heaven with lights, and [provided it] with guard. Such is the Decree of [Him] the Exalted in Might, Full of Knowledge.
Also, look at verse 27:
What! Are ye the more difficult to create or the heaven [above]? [Allah] hath constructed it.
It seems that Allah had experienced certain level of difficulty while creating all of these.
Verse 28:
On high hath He raised its canopy, and He hath given it order and perfection.
The heaven was raised (originally at the bottom).
Tafsir Jalalayn: an explication of the manner of [its] construction; in other words, He made its vertical extension high; it is also said that samkaha means ‘its ceiling’ – and levelled it: He made it even, flawless,
Tafsir Ibn Kathir: He made it a lofty structure, vast in its space, with equal sides, and adorned with stars at night and in the darkness.
The heaven is a structure.
The sun can be folded up and the star “must fall” to the earth. Surah 81:
1. When the sun [with its spacious light] is folded up;
Tafsir Ibn Kathir: (Kuwwirat) is that part of it will be folded up into another part of it. Then it will be rolled up and thrown away. When this is done to it, its light will go away.
Bukhari 4.422:
Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, "The sun and the moon will be folded up (deprived of their light) on the Day of Resurrection."
So the moon will be folded up too which means it has its own light. Why deprives its light if the moon don’t have it in the first place?
2. When the stars fall, losing their lustre;
Tafsir Jalalayn: they are extinguished and hurtle down towards the earth,
Little addition: The Quran claimed that it used Arabic language so that the illiterate Arabs could easily understand it. By applying this to dahaha, we can see that it is also for these illiterate people. Quran used everyday language to the Arabs which means they could also know what kind of activity "daha" is. The question is:
Is there any activity done by Arabs at that time that could be called "making something into egg shaped"? Did they even understand what kind of verb is that? Why do we have a verb and an adjective in one word?
Even with this gymnastic, earth is not even egg shaped.
Seraj,
Following are the translations of QS-79:30 in different versions:
1) Sahih International; And after that He spread the earth.
2) Muhsin Khan; And after that He spread the earth;
3) Pickthall; And after that He spread the earth,
4) Yusuf Ali; And the earth, moreover, hath He extended
(to a wide expanse);
5) Shakir; And the earth, He expanded it after that.
6) Dr. Ghali; And the earth, after that He flattened it (for life).
Notice that all of them refer the word “dahaha” as “to spread” or equivalent words. If you take the entire ayah in Arabic and google translate it, it means “to spread” also.
While you (and many muslim apologists) said; “means to shape something into an Ostrich egg”???
Na’udzubillah bin dzalik!
Why did you lied to us O, Seraj The Scholar of Islam?
And what are your scientific qualifications. You come here and talk nonsense to qualified scientists and expect them to listen to you?
Nobody has refuted Dr. Sina. They are all afraid of him and won't debate. They do tell lies behind his back though.
Nothing has been refuted and can't be because all of Dr. Sina's work is based on facts. So as long as you want to ignore the facts, you can continue to deceive yourself and as many people as you can get to believe you.
You must be kidding. The amount of booty that he required his followers to give him made him a wealthy man and the king of Arabia by the time he died.
Oh, you are here waiting? I'll let him know right away. I'm sure he will want to drop whatever he is doing and get right back to you.
Seraj,
Monalisa has a point. Dahaha is ambiguous, You don’t just interpret Quran to suit your own likings. Islamic publicity stunts by muslim apologists to twist that ambiguousness is pathetic.
Arabic: ﻭﺍﻻﺭﺽ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺩﺣﺎﻫﺎ
Transliteration: Waal-arda baAAda thalika dahaha
Literal: And the earth after that He blew and stretched/spread it.
That’s it! Final. Quran said so.
Disagree this:
“The earth is flat. Whoever claims it is round is an atheist deserving of punishment.”
-Sheik Abdul-Aziz Ibn Baaz, supreme religious authority of Saudi Arabia, 1993.
Still no reply 'Dr.' Sina, hurry up would ya'?
Dear Sina,
You said "he could fool the gullible and rule over them."" for why, to live a luxurious life?
The power, money, most beautiful lady was offered to Muhammad(PBUH) at the early of his preaching to deter by the non believers.
we know he lived a very simple life, wearer of ripped clothes.
According to Blaise Pascal (in article http://alisina.org/what-if-god-exists/) we should believe in God. Because if we now believe that there is no God, but after death suddenly found that there is really a God, then no scope to rectify, straight looser. But If we believe in God in this life, then we will be in safe side whether there is God exists or not. So what we have to do is to find out the only true / loving God among the Gods in various religions.
If Dr. Ali Sina was honest, suppose one of my friends called me, Maruf come out of your home, right then I will asked him where I will live at night? If he could not provide me another home than he has no right to call me come out? My friend should first manage another better home for me if he wants me to leave my current home. But Mr. Sina is not doing that he should have at first come up with a truer / lovelier God comparing to Muslim God before asking Muslims to denounce their faith. But without giving a solution he is offering a problem. This proves that Mr. Ali Sina has something evil hidden in his mind.
He also suggests that to live ethically this will be enough for you. I am also agree with him in this regard.
But who will decide the ethics meaning which is bad or which is right?
Somebody tells, looking to a woman is bad, somebody tells looking is ok but touching is bad, somebody tells shaking and kissing is ok but adultery is bad, somebody tells everything is ok if both agree. Somebody tells Gay is very bad, some tells no it is their right. Some tells to be vegetarian is right , some tells no everything which is permitted can be eaten . Some tells bikini is perfect because it reveals the whole beauty, some tells no- woman should be modestly covered. Doctors say alcohol is harmful but it is permitted in many countries. Some says gambling is bad because it looses man financially, socially but many countries has permitted it. Some says interest is not bad for economy although it can’t resist recession, others tell that Islamic banking is less affected by the recession. A robber says robbery is good because he can earn much money with less effort and enjoy a luxurious life but the victim will say it is crime.
For these reasons laws of every country differs each other and there is a continuous clash between pro and con.
So the question is that who will define the good or bad or set limit. It is obviously the God, the Creator. Otherwise every right or wrong i.e. ethics becomes meaningless. So Gods presence/guidance is essential.
So what is Dr. Sina doing, he is trying to make Muslims ex, without suggesting a more true God/religion for them. He wants to bring them out of home to under the sun, rain, storm, danger. It is inhuman. He is utilizing his brilliancy, literacy for misleading people, for the evil of the society.
[email protected]
Unfortunately, the word "Dahaha" comes from Mudhiya in the Lisan Al-Arab, which means to shape something into an Ostrich egg. As we know, an Ostrich's egg is almost spherical, it resembles the earth's shape perfectly. Sorry.
@ Seraj
First, I want to let you know that I am a neutral person, and my target is the truth, even if this truth
appears to be against my welfare, and I do not support or oppose any one.
The clerics tried to cheat people by telling them that the quran said Allah created the earth in a shape of an egg. They used this Arabic word "DAHAHA".
Do you know what is the meaning of "DAHA" in the classical Arabic? When the ostrich wants to
lay an egg she uses her feet (or whatever you call them) to make the place ( where she wants to
put her egg) flat. This action of the ostrich is called "DAHA" in the old Arabic language.
The Aya in the quran said: "and the earth after that dahaha" it means: made it flat, and not as
a shape of an egg, as they try to mislead others by getting advantage of some ambiguous sentences in the quran.
No one is going to pay me a million of dollars for saying so, I just said it because I love to
see the truth revealed.
Hey I have gone through the first two links. No facts at all. Looks like a puzzle of words. You can not say that Ali Sina is wrong without showing facts. From the above two links and by your post I have come to know that muslims are liars.
Sorry, like you said i was busy googling. Here it is:
HR. Bukhari vol.4/book 54/no.537
Narrated Abu Huraira:
The Prophert said “if a house fly falls in the drink of anyone of you, he should dip it (in the drink), for one of its wings has a disease and the other has the cure fore the disease”.
And can you cite the hadith? Thanks.
Plus, you shoulda been a bit more specific. You said ‘as far as the Qur’an’s science goes’.
I really am worried about how many people are falling for Ali Sina’s refuted allegations, may God guide him and them.
The fly thing?
I was referring to a Hadith.
I wa trying to make an example out of the two, Quran and Hadith about being scientific and all.
But nevermind that.
And, if you don’t mind me saying, how about Googling all the refutals against Ali’s allegations. Not only have his allegations been refuted using the same undependable sources he used, but using the Qur’an and the biography of Muhammad – much greater sources than Sunan Abu Dawood and cherry-picking your favourite Tafsirs.
Sina has been refuted and made dumbfound by numerous scholars and even ordinary Muslims. His lack of understanding the methodology of the Qur’an, namely in how he failed at ‘debunking’ the Qur’an’s (proven) claim that the origin of all living beings is water, and not that animals live thanks to water. His lack of intellect to tackle such importance methodologies makes his arguments against the Qur’an’s methodology uniteresting. Since he’s all for ‘challenging’, then here’s a challenge: prove my debunk of the ‘water debunk’ wrong, and address my post on the ‘gender debate’ with Mallah and Roach completely, and don’t just address the three or four words which please you.
And as for you, Mr./Ms. Juste, how about providing the proof the Qur’an says the earth is flat and the Qur’an’s mention of fly-wings having venom?
Right, Seraj.
I certainly can’t blame a man for trying 🙂
My advice if i may, do yourself a favor and get a copy of Understanding Muhammad by Ali Sina and refute what you find in the book so i can believe you.
Thanks, Dude.
Juste, did I say the Qur’an is a book of science? Nope, I simpley refuted Ali’s claims that the Qur’an errs in the field of science.
So, the Qur’an said the earth is flat? Well, I’d love to see that verse. I recall numerous verses saying that the land was spread out onto an egg-shaped earth, but never the earth itself being flat. In fact, doesn’t the Qur’an say before the land was spread out, God made earth a spherical/egg shape? According to my knowledge, science proves that the land’s crust is just spread out and not round in itself. And doesn’t the Qur’an say that day is merged into night, and night merged into day? Doesn’t this indicate the nature of the earth’s shape and its rotation? If the earth was flat, then no, day becomes night and night becomes day instantly, no ‘merging’.
And your second claim, show me the verse in the Qur’an’s verse which says that? Thanks.
Seraj, snap out of it. Please.
Quran is no science, okay?
If people believe Quran, we still think that the world is flat and geocentric.
Left wing of a fly is venomous, the right wing of the fly is the anti-venom (wtf).
That’s as far as science goes in Quran.
Get over it!
Woops, missed the rest.
– ANIMALS MADE FROM WATER
It's widely known today that animals have strong relations to water, just as humans in embryological history, not to mention the fact the protoplasm consists of 80-85% water. The question is, did the Qur'an say this?:
'Wallahu KHALAQA kulla dabbatin min ma'' – [24:45].
The word "khalaqa" literally means "created", look in any Arabic dictionary or even use a translator. CREATED.
So, does the Qur'an say humans and animals were created from water or their lives revolve around water? You think now.
Once again, I'm not surprised that you've resorted to making false accusations. Most of what I read is gibberish, but I'll address one of the "debunks" you proposed:
Once again, I'm not surprised that you've resorted to making false accusations. Most of what I read is gibberish, but I'll address one of the "debunks" you proposed:
– ANIMALS MADE FROM WATER
The fact that animals have a watery origin in embryological history, as well as the protoplasm being consisted of 80-85% water, is a well known fact now. Did the Qur'an say animals were created from water, or rather can't live without water, as many like you have tried to propose?
'Wallahu KHALAQA kulla dabbatin min ma'' ~ [24:45].
Look it up in any Arab dictionary, in fact, let's see what Google Translator says:
خلق Create
You don't need to be a scientist to know that to say something was "created" from water, meaning it literally was "created" from water, and not having it's life revolve around the existence of water.
May Allah guide you. Amen.
What we find in Quran is just opposite of what today's science tells us. The falsehood of Quran and thereby that of Muhammad and his Allah has well been exposed by science. But yet Muslims find scientific truth in Quran verses by their imagination and unfounded ridiculous claims and lies. This is their pathetic position.
You don’t thank God either Kat. You thanks Satan. Please do not fool yourself. Allah is not God. Allah is either the Devil or Muhammad’s alter-ego so he could fool the gulible and rule over them.
no.
how would you explain the mentioning of a black hole and a knocking star.
why do you only answer your followers questions?
your fake.
you still have not answered the question properly, why do you only bash Islam?
and who do you thank at night?
it is obviosly not God, but who?
yourself?
Muslims claim the Qur'an mentioned the big bang theory long before anyone knew about it.But why did it take a Catholic priest by the name of George Lemaitre to invent this concept?Surely Allah could have shared this knowledge with one of his slaves instead of an infidel.
Kamal see this youtube account http://www.youtube.com/user/TheIslammiracle that debunks all this nonsense.